These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 457072)
1. Incompetent's right to die: who decides? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient? Ramsey P Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Refusing medical treatment: who decides? Barnes G Dimens Health Serv; 1982 Nov; 59(11):24-6. PubMed ID: 7141151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Grady: the mentally retarded individual's right to choose sterilization. Lachance D Am J Law Med; 1981; 6(4):559-90. PubMed ID: 7315845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The end of childhood. Lalani S Can Doct; 1986 Oct; 52(10):17-8. PubMed ID: 10278827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent: the case of Benjamin C. Part I. Gargaro WJ Cancer Nurs; 1979 Oct; 2(5):387-8. PubMed ID: 261043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention. Obernberger S Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The patient's right to die. Rozovsky L Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Jan; 56(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 761731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports. Vaux K J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death. Merritt TL Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1985; 18(2):95-141. PubMed ID: 4086738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota. Klein JE Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment. Ferguson G Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do not resuscitate: the failure to protect the incompetent patient's right of self-determination. Shaver E Cornell Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 75(1):218-45. PubMed ID: 10296951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Jehovah's Witnesses and child protection legislation: the right to refuse medical consent. McLellan MF Leg Med Q; 1977 Mar; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 10249096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]