These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4571099)
41. Research and development in quality assurance. The experimental medical care review organization program. Sanazaro PJ; Goldstein RL; Roberts JS; Maglott DB; McAllister JW N Engl J Med; 1972 Nov; 287(22):1125-31. PubMed ID: 4343177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Medicare and medicaid, 1973. J Med Assoc State Ala; 1973 Oct; 43(4):253-4 passim. PubMed ID: 4583453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Information requirements for management of new health care organizations. Gaus CR Med Care; 1973; 11(2):Suppl:51-60. PubMed ID: 4692412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Record systems for hospital outpatient clinics. Brenner MH; Paris H Med Care; 1973; 11(2):Suppl:41-50. PubMed ID: 4692411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Roundtable demonstration ... review of care given in private physician offices to Medicare beneficiaries. Palmer RH Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS41-4; discussion JS44-7. PubMed ID: 7823658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia. Brehm JG; Smith SM W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Medicare beneficiary complaints about quality of care. Harrington C; Weinberg J; Merrill S; Newman J Am J Med Qual; 2000; 15(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 11126593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Gearing up for peer review at the local level. Geriatrics; 1974 Jan; 29(1):136 passim. PubMed ID: 4586851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital. Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Health services utilization in the U.S. population by health insurance coverage. Garfinkel SA; Corder LS Natl Med Care Util Expend Surv B; 1986 Dec; (13):1-38. PubMed ID: 10304187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The evolving role of the American College of Surgeons in peer review and the PSRO legislation. Dunlop GR R I Med J; 1973 Aug; 56(8):329-32. PubMed ID: 4516956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Automated review of medical practice in the Medicaid program: benefits for providers. MacKay C J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(2):23-8. PubMed ID: 10297484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. CMA in action. Thomas RL Calif Med; 1973 Dec; 119(6):18-37. PubMed ID: 4759816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]