These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4572564)
41. [A program for the computer evaluation of conventional electrocardiograms]. Klusmeier S; Zywietz C; Abel H Verh Dtsch Ges Kreislaufforsch; 1976; 42():397-400. PubMed ID: 795208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Electrocardiographic automation. Caceres CA G Ital Cardiol; 1974; 4(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 4604417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnostic computing: an elective for fourth-year medical students. Bartold S; Hannigan GG Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1165. PubMed ID: 8591394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. How to develop machine learning models for healthcare. Chen PC; Liu Y; Peng L Nat Mater; 2019 May; 18(5):410-414. PubMed ID: 31000806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Probability and medical diagnosis. Lindley DV J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1975 Apr; 9(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 1095732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Computers in paediatrics. 18. Medical decision making: computer program to calculate sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative rates, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of a diagnostic test. Yip WC; Tay JS; Ho TF; Wong HB J Singapore Paediatr Soc; 1986; 28(1-2):74-8. PubMed ID: 3531721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Mathematical-computer method for the improvement of diagnostic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis]. Pakułowa A Reumatologia; 1980; 18(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 7001592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Diagnostic error in the general practice]. Schrömbgens HH MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Apr; 121(16):547-8. PubMed ID: 111044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Editorial: Computer analysis of the electrocardiogram. Bertrand CA Am J Cardiol; 1976 Sep; 38(3):394-5. PubMed ID: 785998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Practical experiences with an own computer program for ECG analysis]. Meyer J; Jensch P; Haager EF; Stühlen HW; Platte M; Rupp M; Effert S Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1974; 80():1157-9. PubMed ID: 4616486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of computerized electrocardiographic interpretations in a community hospital. Pryor WW; Blackhurst DW; Gates K; Wagner GS J S C Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 91(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 7739204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Observer variation in clinical diagnosis--a computer-aided assessment of its magnitude and importance in 552 patients with abdominal pain. Gill PW; Leaper DJ; Guillou PJ; Staniland JR; Horrocks JC; de Dombal FT Methods Inf Med; 1973 Apr; 12(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 4575388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Comparison of ECG interpretation of seven different computer programs with that of three physicians]. Meyer J; Merx W; Heinrich KW; Effert S Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1973; 79():1086-91. PubMed ID: 4597605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Computerized ECG and community practice. A note of caution. Riley CP; Langhorne WH J Fla Med Assoc; 1975 Mar; 62(3):19-23. PubMed ID: 1092808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate computer confidence threshold and clinical performance in the diagnosis appendicitis. de Dombal FT; Horrocks JC Methods Inf Med; 1978 Jul; 17(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 357911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Results of using a computer for differential diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhages and softening in the acute period of a stroke]. Levin GZ; Lebedev ED; Rozman VS Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1973; 73(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 4583763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]