These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4574246)

  • 21. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction: electrocardiograms, vectorcardiograms and its analog computer analysis.
    Mori H; Oshita K
    Jpn Circ J; 1967 Nov; 31(11):1644-9. PubMed ID: 5630891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Defining unrecognized myocardial infarction: a call for standardized electrocardiographic diagnostic criteria.
    Ammar KA; Kors JA; Yawn BP; Rodeheffer RJ
    Am Heart J; 2004 Aug; 148(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 15308997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Usefulness of multicenter evaluation of the reliability of a program for automatic analysis in clinical electrocardiography].
    Feruglio GA; Liverani M; Sicca GT; Zecchi P; Bigalli A; Feraco E; Loperfido F; Marchei M; Mirolo R; Puccini E
    Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3289-96. PubMed ID: 7010212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The constructive approach to evaluation of ECG computer programs.
    Caceres CA
    Clin Eng News; 1977; 5(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 10297035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Editorial: ECG computer analysis-gaps to be filled.
    Pipberger HV
    Eur J Cardiol; 1975 Apr; 2(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 123854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of electrocardiographic records using mathematical tools].
    Hauser H; Perl R; Schorr H
    Arch Kreislaufforsch; 1972 Jun; 67(2):142-58. PubMed ID: 4560260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of electrocardiograms interpreted by physician and computer.
    Acker JJ; Acker JE; Overholt BM
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1972 May; 65(5):439-41. PubMed ID: 4554121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A computer program for measurement of electrocardiograms (author's transl)].
    Nakamura M; Nomura Y; Fukamachi M
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1977 Jun; 15(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 335130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can the lessons learned from the assessment of automated electrocardiogram analysis in the Common Standards for quantitative Electrocardiography study benefit measurement of delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images?
    Fayn J; Rubel P; Macfarlane PW
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 17478178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhancement of diagnostic performance of the 12-lead ECG by using measurements from the synthesized vectorcardiogram.
    Pettersson J; Edenbrandt L; Pahlm O; Haisty WK
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():95. PubMed ID: 8189155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The value of the computer as a screening tool for routine electrocardiograms.
    Verdesca AS
    J Occup Med; 1972 Apr; 14(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 4553521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [ECG interpretation by computer. How reliable is rhythm diagnosis?].
    Rosendahl L; Pahlm O
    Lakartidningen; 1994 May; 91(21):2140-2. PubMed ID: 8052000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparative evaluations between on-line and off-line in automatic electrocardiographic diagnosis and readings of the cardiologist].
    Bigalli A; Ciuti M; Davini P; Puccini E; Sicca GT
    Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3297-300. PubMed ID: 7010213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-assisted interpretation of electro- and vectorcardiograms.
    Brohet C
    Rev Inst Hyg Mines (Hasselt); 1980; 35(3):135-96. PubMed ID: 7013008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computers in cardiology.
    Friedberg CK
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1970 Jul; 13(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 4915327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Delayed initial QRS forces of intraventricular pacing: unreliability of the scalar ECG in their diagnosis.
    Naschitz JE; Abinader EG; Yeshurun D
    Isr J Med Sci; 1984 Aug; 20(8):690-4. PubMed ID: 6469591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms.
    Armstrong JB; Cuddy TE; Milliken JA
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1229. PubMed ID: 4145068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The constructive approach to evaluation of ECG computer programs.
    Caceres CA
    Clin Eng; 1977; 5(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 10242825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.