These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4574248)

  • 1. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. IV. Suggested minimal performance requirements and methods of performance evaluation for computer ECG analysis programs.
    Helppi RR; Unite V; Wolf HK
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1251-9. PubMed ID: 4574248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. II. Some considerations relevant to the selection of ECG Program.
    Milliken JA
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 4574246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. V. Suggested standards for instrumentation in computer processing of electrocardiograms.
    Sherwood JD
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1259-61. PubMed ID: 4574249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of electrocardiograms. 3. Present state of arrhythmia analysis by computer.
    LeBlanc AR; Roberge FA
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1239-51. PubMed ID: 4574247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. VII. Considerations relevant to a rational transition from the present system to automated ECG analysis.
    Manfreda J; Klassen GA
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1265-8. PubMed ID: 4574251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. I. Review of the present state of automated electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Marriott MR; Fraser RS; Rose DJ; Daechsel WF
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1230-2. PubMed ID: 4574245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted interpretation of electro- and vectorcardiograms. Chapter IV. Achievements in the field of computer-assisted interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Brohet C
    Rev Inst Hyg Mines (Hasselt); 1980; 35(4):201-64. PubMed ID: 7015461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer interpretation of electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms.
    Enderle J; Telerman M; Pordy L; Chesky K; Jaffe H
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():194-202. PubMed ID: 775912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. VI. Importance of the electrocardiogram in populations outside the hospital.
    Blackburn H
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1262-5. PubMed ID: 4574250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. European Conformance Testing Services for computerized electrocardiography. New procedures and standards.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():137-46. PubMed ID: 8189115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; Brohet CR; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G; Machado H; Michaelis J
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 2233377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [ECG interpretation by computer. How reliable is rhythm diagnosis?].
    Rosendahl L; Pahlm O
    Lakartidningen; 1994 May; 91(21):2140-2. PubMed ID: 8052000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On designing and testing transformations for derivation of standard 12-lead/18-lead electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms from reduced sets of predictor leads.
    Horácek BM; Warren JW; Wang JJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 18433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Usefulness of multicenter evaluation of the reliability of a program for automatic analysis in clinical electrocardiography].
    Feruglio GA; Liverani M; Sicca GT; Zecchi P; Bigalli A; Feraco E; Loperfido F; Marchei M; Mirolo R; Puccini E
    Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3289-96. PubMed ID: 7010212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)].
    Enenkel W; Spiel R; Kiss E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 86(18):523-7. PubMed ID: 4277767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative evaluations between on-line and off-line in automatic electrocardiographic diagnosis and readings of the cardiologist].
    Bigalli A; Ciuti M; Davini P; Puccini E; Sicca GT
    Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3297-300. PubMed ID: 7010213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms.
    Armstrong JB; Cuddy TE; Milliken JA
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1229. PubMed ID: 4145068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the normal values for signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
    Marcus FI; Zareba W; Sherrill D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 17338774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. QRS axis validation in clinical electrocardiography.
    Spodick DH; Frisella M; Apiyassawat S
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 101(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 18178420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.