These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4580150)

  • 1. Eliciting effects of verbal and nonverbal cues on projective test responses.
    Stewart DJ; Patterson ML
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1973 Aug; 41(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 4580150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of specific cue content on need for achievement scores.
    Ludvigh EJ; Thomas B; Happ D
    J Pers Assess; 1974 Feb; 38(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 4592503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RECURRING DILEMMAS IN PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT.
    HOLTZMAN WH
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Jun; 28():144-50. PubMed ID: 14175629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responses of an aged population on the Gerontological and Thematic Apperception tests.
    Fitzgerald BJ; Pasewark RA; Fleisher S
    J Pers Assess; 1974 Jun; 38(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 4605058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opinions predict opinions: so what else is new?
    McClelland DC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1972 Jun; 38(3):325-6. PubMed ID: 4555789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses.
    Rader GE; Schill TR
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 4575075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interest and limitations of projective techniques in the assessment of personality disorders.
    Petot JM
    Eur Psychiatry; 2000 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():11-4. PubMed ID: 11520468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Projective methodologies.
    Molish HB
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1972; 23():577-614. PubMed ID: 4552210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A scoring scheme for the TAT and other verbal projective techniques.
    FINE R
    J Proj Tech; 1955 Sep; 19(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 13243387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thematic techniques and clinical practice.
    Dana RH
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Jun; 32(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 4385565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The projective test as a means of approach to psychotherapy].
    Hennig W
    Z Psychother Med Psychol; 1968 Sep; 18(5):184-9. PubMed ID: 4883310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Rapid prognosis of the disciplined behavior of flight cadets using projective tests].
    Evdokimov VI
    Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1985; 19(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 3887027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manual for a scoring scheme for verbal projective techniques (TAT, MAPS, stories and the like).
    FINE R
    J Proj Tech; 1955 Sep; 19(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 13243388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rorschach adjustment and the Thematic Apperception Test.
    SHATIN L
    J Proj Tech; 1953 Mar; 17(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 13053482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of Thematic Apperception Test to differentiate normal from abnormal groups.
    RITTER AM; ERON LD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1952 Apr; 47(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 14937948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operant conditioning effects upon drawing content.
    Pikunas J
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Apr; 30(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 5326006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Children's Apperception Test: puzzle and regular form.
    Hoar MW; Faust WL
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 4575077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-scorer reliability of David's three projective measures of alienation.
    Clark ET; Propper MM
    Psychol Rep; 1969 Aug; 25(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 4904276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation of photo-trait-attribution method of personality assessment of standard assessment techniques.
    Vacchiano RB; Lieberman LR; Adrian RJ; Schiffman DC
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Feb; 22(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 4867985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Projective fantasy on the CAT and CAT-H.
    Neuringer C; Livesay RC
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1970 Dec; 34(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 4923421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.