These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4584086)
1. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning fork tests of Weber and Rinne. I. The "Weber test" and its first description by Schmalz. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1973; 35(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 4584086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [History of the tuning fork. II: Evolution of the classical experiments by Weber, Rinne and Schwabach]. Feldmann H Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):318-26. PubMed ID: 9280421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning-fork tests of Weber, Rinne, Schwabach, and Bing. III. The development of the Schwabach and Bing tests. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1975; 37(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 1093082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning-fork tests of Weber, Rinne, Schwabach, and Bing. II. The "Rhine Test" and its first description by Polansky. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1975; 37(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 1093081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early history of tuning-fork tests. Ng M; Jackler RK Am J Otol; 1993 Jan; 14(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 8424469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion. Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rinne test: does the tuning fork position affect the sound amplitude at the ear? Butskiy O; Ng D; Hodgson M; Nunez DA J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 45():21. PubMed ID: 27013057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [History of the tuning fork. I: Invention of the tuning fork, its course in music and natural sciences. Pictures from the history of otorhinolaryngology, presented by instruments from the collection of the Ingolstadt German Medical History Museum]. Feldmann H Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 9172630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests]. Ziemer C MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test. Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [History of the tuning fork. III: On the way to quantitative pure-tone measurement. Pictures from the history of otorhinolaryngology, represented by instruments from the collection of the Ingolstadt German Medical History Museum]. Feldmann H Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jul; 76(7):428-34. PubMed ID: 9333296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss. Miltenburg DM J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks. MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests. Wilson WR; Woods LA Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 Feb; 101(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 1092293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]