These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4587179)

  • 1. [Urine bacteriology. A performance comparison of slide- and agar-plate cultures].
    Schöll H
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1973 Dec; 123(50):753-4. PubMed ID: 4587179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The dip-slide method once more. Does the sampling waver?].
    Bevanger L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1973 Nov; 93(30):2238-9. PubMed ID: 4588010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of quantitative bacterial cultures of the urine--a proposal of 0.05 ml smear method].
    Kudo H; Sato S; Goto S; Ishitoya Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1970 Jul; 18(7):524-8. PubMed ID: 4989929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bacteriuria screening: comparison of the results obtained with dip-slide and other methods (author's transl)].
    Giganti E; Lamanna S
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1980 Sep; 16(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 7017799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial counts in urine. 2. A comparison of different methods.
    Haugen J; Ström O; Ostervold B
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand; 1969; 77(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 4904666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A simple modification for the exact determination of the germ count in bacteriological urine examination].
    Hussels H
    Med Lab (Stuttg); 1969 Jan; 22(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 4892908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bacteriology of urinary infections].
    Regamey C
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1978 Nov; 98(11):633-7. PubMed ID: 366712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of quantitative bacterioscopic study and urine culture in the diagnosis of urinary infection in pediatrics].
    dos Santos MA; Mos EN; Schmidt BJ; Piva S
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1982 Aug; 39(8):526-30. PubMed ID: 6763538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of CPS ID 3 and CHROMagar Orientation chromogenic agars with standard biplate technique for culture of clinical urine samples.
    Chang JC; Chien ML; Chen HM; Yan JJ; Wu JJ
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Oct; 41(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 19122925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative culture of urine. A comparative study of semiquantitative method with the quantitative pour plate method.
    Deshmukh CK; Sharma KD
    Indian J Pathol Bacteriol; 1970 Jan; 13(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 4924949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative study of urine in dogs using Urotube vet. Roche, Bactrim-Urotube and standard bacteriological methods].
    Häusermann L; Zanesco S
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 1981 Sep; 123(9):483-90. PubMed ID: 7029708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Description of a simple method for the bacteriological examination of urine. Preliminary note].
    Avantey S; Stevenin F; Ceol A; Saggiorato R
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1980 Jun; 16(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 7017797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A semi-automated method for the culture, identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria direct from urine specimens.
    Henrichsen C; Moyes A
    Med Lab Sci; 1987 Jan; 44(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 3309532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Statistical studies of the errors of the "drop-plating" technic in germ cell counts in food].
    Untermann F
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig; 1970; 215(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 4925381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Can we rely on the results of urine microscopy and culture when tests are performed in general practice?].
    Bjerrum L; Grinsted P; Søgaard P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(14):1927-30. PubMed ID: 11957428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of a new urine collection-culture tube with the standard loop technique.
    Martin LP; Ahmed M
    Am J Med Technol; 1974 Mar; 40(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 4592623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transport of urine for bacteriological examination.
    Jacobs SI; Woods EH; Ramsden CH
    Med Lab Technol; 1972 Oct; 29(4):414-6. PubMed ID: 4563274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The dip slide--a simple method for determination of bacterial count in the urine].
    Biechteler W; Haas F
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1970 May; 112(19):883-7. PubMed ID: 4911081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bacteriological study of urine obtained by bladder puncture after several days of storage].
    Thieler H; Wachtel D; Jung N
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1971 Jan; 26(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 4934719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experiences with uricult, a new method for the quantitative determination of bacteria in urine].
    Breitfellner G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1970 Apr; 120(14):235-43. PubMed ID: 4933975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.