These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4587904)

  • 1. Tolerance to heterologous erythrocytes.
    Auerbach R; Roethle J
    Science; 1974 Jan; 183(4122):332-4. PubMed ID: 4587904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separation of T and B lymphocytes by nylon wool columns: evaluation of efficacy by functional assays in vivo.
    Trizio D; Cudkowicz G
    J Immunol; 1974 Oct; 113(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 4607056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restoration of the in vitro antibody response of cortisone-treated spleen cells by T cells or soluble factors.
    Vann DC
    Cell Immunol; 1974 Mar; 11(1-3):11-8. PubMed ID: 4616758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Release of suppressor factors by the lymphocytes of mice in contact with syngeneic and xenogeneic erythrocytes].
    Leskov VP; Cheredeev AN; Solov'ev VV
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1977 Mar; 83(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 322764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demonstration of suppressor T cells in a population of 'educated' T cells.
    Taussig MJ
    Nature; 1974 Mar; 248(445):236-8. PubMed ID: 4594644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mechanism for the unresponsive state in BALB-c mice after repeated doses of sheep erythrocytes.
    Thomson PD; Jutila JW
    J Immunol; 1972 Oct; 109(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 4627508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of parental lymphoid cells on the production of 19S and 7S antibodies in F1 hybrid mice.
    Lindholm L; Strannegård O
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1974; 47(4):508-19. PubMed ID: 4153381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of T cells and adjuvant in the immune response of mice to foreign erythrocytes.
    Dresser DW
    Eur J Immunol; 1972 Feb; 2(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 4563145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Separation of T effector cells in humoral and cellular immunity.
    Elliot BE; Haskill JS
    Nature; 1974 Dec; 252(5484):607-8. PubMed ID: 4610426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Nature and biological role of the plaque formation phenomenon with autologous erythrocytes].
    Pukhova IaI; Anikina AIa; Shashkin AV
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1977 Oct; (10):137-8. PubMed ID: 335730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presence of antibody-forming cell precursors in the mouse adherent spleen cell population.
    Loughman BE; Farrar JJ; Nordin AA
    J Immunol; 1974 Jan; 112(1):430-2. PubMed ID: 4590826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The immune response of mice treated with anti-mu antibodies: the effect on antibody-forming cells, their precursors and helper cells assayed in vitro.
    Gordon J; Murgita RA; Tomasi TB
    J Immunol; 1975 Jun; 114(6):1808-12. PubMed ID: 805179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. T cell factor which can replace T cells in vivo.
    Taussig MJ
    Nature; 1974 Mar; 248(445):234-6. PubMed ID: 4594643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential sensitivity of bone marrow and thymus cells to actinomycin D in the in vivo response of mice to sheep erythrocytes.
    Kaufman SJ; Radovich J; Talmage DW
    J Immunol; 1973 Feb; 110(2):476-81. PubMed ID: 4567394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specific immunosuppression of antibody responses by an antiserum against a T-cell factor.
    Gorczynski RM; Miller RG; Phillips RA
    Transplant Proc; 1973 Mar; 5(1):607-9. PubMed ID: 4572119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. T cell deficiency in mouse allogeneic radiation chimeras.
    Urso P; Gengozian N
    J Immunol; 1973 Sep; 111(3):712-9. PubMed ID: 4582262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of interaction of cells, transplanted into syngeneic and allogeneic recipients, during the immune response to heterologous erythrocytes].
    Gambarov SS; Golovistikov IN
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1973 Sep; 76(9):109-12. PubMed ID: 4591447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of allogeneic cell interaction on the primary immune response in vitro. Cell types involved in suppression and stimulation of antibody synthesis.
    Sjöberg O
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1972 Nov; 12(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 4404919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antigen recognition. 3. Effect of phytomitogens on antigen-receptor capping and the immune response in vitro.
    Lee KC; Langman RE; Paetkau VH; Diener E
    Eur J Immunol; 1973 May; 3(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 4586164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immunologic tolerance to a hapten. 3. Induction of tolerance to trinitrophenyl in B cells in various differentiation states.
    Fidler JM; Golub ES
    J Immunol; 1974 May; 112(5):1891-9. PubMed ID: 4594419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.