These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. Stanley HR; Going RE; Chauncey HH J Am Dent Assoc; 1975 Oct; 91(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 1057623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pulp reaction to a resin-bonded quartz composite material. Tobias M; Cataldo E; Shiere FR; Clark RE J Dent Res; 1973; 52(6):1281-6. PubMed ID: 4357227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Pulpal effects of nuva seal on dogs' teeth. Goto G; Machida Y Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1976 Feb; 17(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 1076062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparative analysis of zinc oxide-eugenol liquid and solid for use in indirect pulp protection. Histomorphological study in dogs]. Harrán E; Comelli Lia RC; Martin E; Benatti Neto C Rev Esp Endodoncia; 1985 Sep; 3(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 3869970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of four dental materials in vitro assessed by cell viability and enzyme cytochemistry. Meryon SD; Browne RM J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Jul; 10(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 6577162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of zinc oxide and eugenol on microorganisms in the dental pulp. McKnight JP J Dent Child; 1967 May; 34(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 5338511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An evaluation of a zinc oxide and eugenol cement containing o-ethoxybenzoic acid on the human deciduous dental pulp. Roberts MW; Moffa JP; Hull JR; Lilly GE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1973 Sep; 36(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 4516471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. An evaluation of the protective properties of a new varnish. Kaufman C; Pelzner RB; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1982 Jun; 13(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 6215672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Study of the tissue reaction to implantation of epoxy filling materials]. Ivanov VS Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1969; 48(3):41-3. PubMed ID: 5256283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Pulpal response to an epimine plastic. Kazanoglu A; Kim HW; Sayegh F J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 110924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Pulp response to composite resins in primary posterior teeth. 1. Comparison of Companies A and B composite resins for molars]. Motokawa W; Aso H; Kuba Y; Nomiyama S; Hirakawa E; Yoshida Y; Taniguchi K; Kitamura K Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1984; 22(4):861-70. PubMed ID: 6598506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Capping of exposed pulps with Cavit-W or Nimeticap. Wijnbergen MJ; van Weelderen B; van Mullem PJ; Wolters JM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 6215604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pulp reaction to a temporary zinc oxide/eugenol cement. Brännström M; Nyborg H J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Feb; 35(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 1061813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between zinc oxide-eugenol and polycarboxylate cements on formocresol pulpotomies. Garcia-Godoy F J Pedod; 1982; 6(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 6964589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Pulp response in the rhesus monkey to "composite" dental restorative materials in unlined cavities. Rao SR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1971 May; 31(5):676-88. PubMed ID: 4995487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]