These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4593591)
1. An assessment of the Delaney clause after 15 years. Oser BL Food Cosmet Toxicol; 1973 Dec; 11(6):1121-6. PubMed ID: 4593591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Delaney clause: too much of a good thing? Corliss J J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Apr; 85(8):600-3. PubMed ID: 8468715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A regulatory relic: After 60 years of research on cancer risk, the Delaney Clause continues to keep us in the past. Krishan M; Navarro L; Beck B; Carvajal R; Dourson M Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2021 Dec; 433():115779. PubMed ID: 34737146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial: Comments on the scientific basis for the "Delaney Clause". Saffiotti U Prev Med; 1973 Mar; 2(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 4803323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Delaney clause heads for the history books. Appel A Nature; 1995 Jul; 376(6536):109. PubMed ID: 7603551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Carcinogens in food and the Delaney clause. Jukes TH JAMA; 1979 Feb; 241(6):617-9. PubMed ID: 762818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Food safety and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Delaney Clause). AMA Council on Scientific Affairs. Conn Med; 1980 Mar; 44(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 7363620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA. Fenner-Crisp PA Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):199-200. PubMed ID: 8672877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A de minimis exception to the Delaney Clause: a reassessment of Les v. Reilly. Sheehy DT Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):257-84. PubMed ID: 10342994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpreting the Delaney Clause in the 21st century. Picut CA; Parker GA Toxicol Pathol; 1992; 20(4):617-27, discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 1308627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer-causing substances in food, drugs, and cosmetics. The de minimis rule versus the Delaney clause. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1988 Nov; 319(19):1262-4. PubMed ID: 3273488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Living with and reforming the Delaney Clause. Degnan FH; Flamm WG Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):235-56. PubMed ID: 10342993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically. Williams GM; Karbe E; Fenner-Crisp P; Iatropoulos MJ; Weisburger JH Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):209-15. PubMed ID: 8672879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Additives in animal nutrition. The problem of residues]. Pantaleon J Ann Nutr Aliment; 1972; 26(4):69-96. PubMed ID: 4678082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The toxicological evaluation (margin of safety, tolerances) for food legislation (food additives and pesticide residues) (author's transl)]. Bär F Arch Toxicol; 1974 Mar; 32(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 4839070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Current carcinogen perspectives: De minimis, Delaney and decisions. Weisburger EK Sci Total Environ; 1989 Oct; 86(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 2690341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]