These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 45941)

  • 1. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans.
    Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Feb; 38(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 45941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():61-71. PubMed ID: 30921642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Li X; Jeng FC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation.
    Glaser EM; Suter CM; Dasheiff R; Goldberg A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1976 Jan; 40(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 55345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The audiometric utility of brain stem responses to low-frequency sounds.
    Davis H; Hirsh SK
    Audiology; 1976; 15(3):181-95. PubMed ID: 938332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones.
    Greenberg S; Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC
    Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):91-114. PubMed ID: 3558136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():113-123. PubMed ID: 30096491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-latency auditory responses obtained by cross correlation.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1411-21. PubMed ID: 6512103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.
    Smalt CJ; Krishnan A; Bidelman GM; Ananthakrishnan S; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 292(1-2):26-34. PubMed ID: 22910032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1665-72. PubMed ID: 2341670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.
    Gockel HE; Farooq R; Muhammed L; Plack CJ; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2524-35. PubMed ID: 23039446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-level frequency-following response.
    De Boer E; Machiels MB; Kruidenier C
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 880127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 6175503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem frequency following responses to waveform envelope periodicity.
    Hall JW
    Science; 1979 Sep; 205(4412):1297-9. PubMed ID: 472748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: evidence for the locus of brainstem sources.
    Smith JC; Marsh JT; Brown WS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Nov; 39(5):465-72. PubMed ID: 52439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
    Zhang X; Gong Q
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.