These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4595346)
1. On evaluating autonomic and verbal indices of negative preception. Furedy JJ; Klajner F Psychophysiology; 1974 Mar; 11(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 4595346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On the validity of the preception hypothesis. Lykken DT; Tellegen A Psychophysiology; 1974 Mar; 11(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 4595347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Orienting responses and personality variables as predictors of differential conditioning of electrodermal responses and awareness of stimulus relations. Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE; Cowan CO J Pers Soc Psychol; 1973 Aug; 27(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 4723975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Autonomic responses and verbal reports in further tests of the preparatory-adaptive-response interpretation of reinforcement. Furedy JJ; Doob AN J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 5567134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed habituation of the electrodermal orienting response as a function of increased level of arousal. Bohlin G Psychophysiology; 1976 Jul; 13(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 951477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential GSR conditioning accompanied by a two-light prediction task. Hunt DP; Daily RF J Gen Psychol; 1974 Apr; 90(2d Half):165-77. PubMed ID: 4833495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning. A review and analysis. Weiss SJ Psychol Bull; 1972 Sep; 78(3):189-208. PubMed ID: 4560788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of cognitive control processes on the classically conditioned galvanic skin response: a within-subjects design. Harvey CB; Wickens DD J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 4753857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two methods for producing response inhibition in electrodermal conditioning. Grings WW; Carey CA; Schell AM J Exp Psychol; 1974 Oct; 103(4):658-62. PubMed ID: 4448964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual differences in infant orienting and autonomic conditioning. Ingram E; Fitzgerald HE Dev Psychobiol; 1974 Jul; 7(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 4425337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Attempted maintenance of the classically conditioned GSR via response-contingent termination of the CS: negative results. Kimmel HD; Lucas ME J Exp Psychol; 1973 Feb; 97(2):278-80. PubMed ID: 4705239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Change in stimulus conditions and the orienting response. O'Gorman JG Psychophysiology; 1973 Sep; 10(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 4580621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]