These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4595892)

  • 1. Bacterial growth and pulpal changes under inlays cemented with zinc phosphate cement and Epoxylite CBA 9080.
    Brännström M; Nyborg H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 May; 31(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 4595892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulpal reaction to polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate cements used with inlays in deep cavity preparations.
    Brännström M; Nyborg H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1977 Feb; 94(2):308-10. PubMed ID: 264487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulpal response in rhesus monkeys to cementation agents and cleaners.
    Eames WB; Hendrix K; Mohler HC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Jan; 98(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 103953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monkey pulpal response to adhesively luted indirect resin composite inlays.
    Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Fujitani M; Otsuki M; Shono T; Onoe N; Morigami M; Takatsu T
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 7479188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Porcelain inlays cemented with composite resin cement: an in vivo investigation of pulpal reaction one year following cementation.
    Vigolo P; Graiff L; Mutinelli S; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17362422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and microscopic pulp response to a composite restorative material.
    Dickey DM; el-Kafrawy AH; Mitchell DF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Jan; 88(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 4588259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps.
    Cox CF; Keall CL; Keall HJ; Ostro E; Bergenholtz G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3468243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacterial contamination and the toxicity of silicate and zinc phosphate cements.
    Watts A
    Br Dent J; 1979 Jan; 146(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 282913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulpal response to pin placement.
    Schuchard A; Reed OM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Mar; 29(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 4510590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal response of monkeys to a composite resin cement.
    Eriksen HM
    J Dent Res; 1974; 53(3):565-70. PubMed ID: 4208990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response.
    Heys RJ; Fitzgerald M; Heys DR; Charbeneau GT
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 May; 114(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 3474264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulp reaction to a temporary zinc oxide/eugenol cement.
    Brännström M; Nyborg H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Feb; 35(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 1061813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biocompatability of compomer restorative systems on nonexposed dental pulps of primate teeth.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Suzuki SH; Suzuki S; Cox CF
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(4):149-58. PubMed ID: 9484155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pulp reactions to different preparation techniques on teeth exhibiting periodontal disease.
    Zöllner A; Gaengler P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 10672144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histopathological study of a quartz-filled composite dental restorative material.
    Adams RJ; Lord GH
    J Dent Res; 1973; 52(2):362-5. PubMed ID: 4347830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of the dental pulp to invasion of bacteria around three filling materials.
    Brännström M; Vojinović O
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1976; 43(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 767383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application.
    White KC; Cox CF; Kanka J; Dixon DL; Farmer JB; Snuggs HM
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 8058899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations.
    Fujitani M; Inokoshi S; Hosoda H
    Int Dent J; 1992 Feb; 42(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 1563819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.