These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4595958)

  • 1. Comparison of fluorescent-antibody methods and enrichment serology for the detection of Salmonella.
    Mohr HK; Trenk HL; Yeterian M
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Feb; 27(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 4595958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a fluorescent antibody-enrichment serology combination procedure for the detection of salmonellae in condiments, food products, food by-products, and animal feeds.
    Hilker HS; Solberg M
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Nov; 26(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 4586931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A rapid, presumptive procedure for the detection of Salmonella in foods and food ingredients.
    Hoben DA; Ashton DH; Peterson AC
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Jan; 25(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 4568884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of an automated fluorescent antibody procedure for detection of Salmonella in foods and feeds.
    Munson TE; Schrade JP; Bisciello NB; Fantasia LD; Hartung WH; O'Connor JJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1976 Apr; 31(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 773305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluorescent antibody method for the detection of Salmonella: development, evaluation, and collaborative study.
    Fantasia LD; Schrade JP; Yager JF; Debler D
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1975 Jul; 58(4):828-44. PubMed ID: 1097387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid detection of salmonellas in raw meats using a fluorescent antibody-microcolony technique.
    Rodrigues UM; Kroll RG
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 Mar; 68(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 2187844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of type of enrichment and duration of incubation on salmonella recovery from meat-and-bone meal.
    Huhtanen CN; Naghski J
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Mar; 23(3):578-85. PubMed ID: 4553803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid detection of Salmonella microcolonies by fluorescent antibody.
    Thomason BM
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Dec; 22(6):1064-9. PubMed ID: 4944805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct fluorescent-antibody technique for the microbiological examination of food and environmental swab samples for salmonellae.
    Insalata NF; Mahnke CW; Dunlap WG
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Sep; 26(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 4584574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid, direct fluorescent-antibody method for the detection of salmonellae in food and feeds.
    Insalata NF; Mahnke CW; Dunlap WG
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Oct; 24(4):645-9. PubMed ID: 4564047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of enrichment procedures for fluorescent antibody and cultural detection of salmonellae in raw meat and poultry.
    Thomason BM; Dodd DJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1976 May; 31(5):787-8. PubMed ID: 776088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of poultry litter for Salmonellae by direct culture and fluorescent antibody technique.
    Smyser CF; Snoeyenbos GH
    Avian Dis; 1976; 20(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 786247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the salmonellae fluoro-kit for fluorescent-antibody staining.
    Insalata NF; Dunlap WG; Mahnke CW
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Feb; 25(2):202-4. PubMed ID: 4571655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Salmonella by a single-culture technique.
    Abrahamsson K; Patterson G; Riemann H
    Appl Microbiol; 1968 Nov; 16(11):1695-8. PubMed ID: 4881954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of selenite F, Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate and Rappaport's medium for salmonella isolation from chicken giblets after pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water.
    Harvey RW; Price TH
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 7026671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Warburton DW
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1992 May; 16(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1389993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accelerated immunofluorescence procedure for the detection of Salmonella in foods and animal by-products.
    Fantasia LD
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Nov; 18(5):708-13. PubMed ID: 4905601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salmonellae as an index of pollution of surface waters.
    Cherry WB; Hanks JB; Thomason BM; Murlin AM; Biddle JW; Croom JM
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Sep; 24(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 4562473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicability of aeration and delayed addition of selenite to the isolation of salmonellae.
    Alford JA; Knight NL
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Dec; 18(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 4905697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison of methods for the enrichment of Salmonellae from human feces].
    Müller HE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Nov; 253(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 6762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.