These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 459836)
41. The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory. Dew IT; Mulligan NW Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1157-67. PubMed ID: 18927034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Incidental cues and picture/word differences in recall. Peeck J; Van Dam G; Uhlenbeck WF Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 604900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Stimulus selection by the retarded: list length and response requirement. Berry F; Baumeister AA; Duncan EM Am J Psychol; 1975 Mar; 88(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 1236564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. On perceptual and memory processes in the word-frequency effect. Richards LG Am J Psychol; 1973 Dec; 86(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 4802804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting. Jakab E; Raaijmakers JG J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):607-17. PubMed ID: 19379039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Differential recall of stimuli and responses following paired-associate learning. Merryman SS; Merryman CT J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jun; 77(2):345-6. PubMed ID: 5655131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Visual and semantic support for paired-associates recall in young and older adults. Sharps MJ; Antonelli JR J Genet Psychol; 1997 Sep; 158(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 9255961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of word frequency and acoustic similarity on free-recall and paired-associate-recognition learning. Holborn SW; Gross KL; Catlin PA J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 4759633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Rehearsal of visual and auditory stimuli while shadowing. Kroll NE; Kellicut MH; Parks TE J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 1141832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. False memory in bilinguals: does switching languages increase false memories? Marmolejo G; Diliberto-Macaluso KA; Altarriba JE Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19353928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall. Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: a comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules. Gerbier E; Koenig O Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 21895560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. S-R VS. R-S RECALL AND R-TERM VS. S-TERM RECALL FOLLOWING PAIRED-ASSOCIATE TRAINING. NEWMAN SE; GRAY CW Am J Psychol; 1964 Sep; 77():444-50. PubMed ID: 14196605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of sensory modality for presentation and word imagery on paired-associate learning. Papineau W; Lohr JM Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Jun; 52(3):747-50. PubMed ID: 7267250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Priming of old and new knowledge in amnesic patients and normal subjects. Schacter DL Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1985; 444():41-53. PubMed ID: 3860094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Contextual cueing as an aid to Korsakoff amnesics. Winocur G; Kinsbourne M Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(6):671-82. PubMed ID: 748804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effect of concurrent task performance. Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16569142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]