These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4598671)
1. New principles governing the tissue reactivity of prosthetic materials. Clark RE; Boyd JC; Moran JF J Surg Res; 1974 May; 16(5):510-22. PubMed ID: 4598671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants. Wagner H; Beller FK; Pfautsch M Plast Reconstr Surg; 1977 Jul; 60(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 327493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Acceptance of polytetrafluoroethylene by subcutaneous connective tissue]. Richter EJ Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989 Oct; 34(10):243-7. PubMed ID: 2684282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microtopography and soft tissue response. Campbell CE; von Recum AF J Invest Surg; 1989; 2(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 2487399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Studies on the effect of degree of hydrophilicity on tissue response of polyurethane interpenetrating polymer networks. Nair PD; Mohanty M; Rathinam K; Jayabalan M; Krishnamurthy VN Biomaterials; 1992; 13(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 1633227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary in vivo biocompatibility studies on perfluorosulphonic acid polymer membranes for biosensor applications. Turner RF; Harrison DJ; Rajotte RV Biomaterials; 1991 May; 12(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 1832311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Experimental study using porous, vascularizable polytetrafluoroethylene in preformed free flaps]. Hörl HW; Klöppel M; Biemer E Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1992 Sep; 24(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 1385280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue reactions to breast implants coated with polyurethane. Smahel J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1978 Jan; 61(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 339248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of microgeometry, implant thickness and polyurethane chemistry on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants. Ward WK; Slobodzian EP; Tiekotter KL; Wood MD Biomaterials; 2002 Nov; 23(21):4185-92. PubMed ID: 12194521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological study of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) implanted in the human nose. Park CH Rhinology; 2008 Dec; 46(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 19146003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo biocompatibility studies. II. Biomer: preliminary cell adhesion and surface characterization studies. Marchant RE; Anderson JM; Phua K; Hiltner A J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Mar; 18(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 6715395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural-Y Même polyurethane versus smooth silicone: analysis of the soft-tissue interaction from 3 days to 1 year in the rat animal model. Picha GJ; Goldstein JA; Stohr E Plast Reconstr Surg; 1990 Jun; 85(6):903-16. PubMed ID: 2190246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Recent aspects of the biocompatibility of carbon fibers. A histologic and electron microscopy analysis]. Sparmann M; Noack W Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1986; 124(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 3551364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Theoretical analysis of in vivo macrophage adhesion and foreign body giant cell formation on polydimethylsiloxane, low density polyethylene, and polyetherurethanes. Kao WJ; Zhao QH; Hiltner A; Anderson JM J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jan; 28(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 8126032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]