These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 460065)

  • 41. The influence of scatter on the design of optimized intensity modulations.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Bortfeld T; Mohan R; Reinstein L
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1727-33. PubMed ID: 8587525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of dosimeter type for commissioning small photon beams on calculated dose distribution in stereotactic radiosurgery.
    García-Garduño OA; Rodríguez-Ponce M; Gamboa-deBuen I; Rodríguez-Villafuerte M; Galván de la Cruz OO; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092101. PubMed ID: 25186401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dose uncertainties in photon pencil kernel calculations at off-axis positions.
    Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3418-25. PubMed ID: 17022238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Use of a tungsten filter to improve beam uniformity.
    Chu JC; Galvin JM; Lockett P; Bloch P
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(4):520-2. PubMed ID: 6798398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
    Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Validity of the concept of separating primary and scatter dose.
    Mohan R; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(6):726-30. PubMed ID: 4079863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The use of variable grid spacing to accelerate dose calculations.
    Niemierko A; Goitein M
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 2544792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of analytic source models for head scatter factor calculation and planar dose calculation for IMRT.
    Yan G; Liu C; Lu B; Palta JR; Li JG
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):2051-67. PubMed ID: 18364554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
    Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Derivation of the distribution of extrafocal radiation for head scatter factor calculation.
    Zhu XR; Gillin MT
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 15789579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Internal scatter, the unavoidable major component of the peripheral dose in photon-beam radiotherapy.
    Chofor N; Harder D; Willborn KC; Poppe B
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1733-43. PubMed ID: 22398213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Using a photon phase-space source for convolution/superposition dose calculations in radiation therapy.
    Naqvi SA; D'Souza WD; Earl MA; Ye SJ; Shih R; Li XA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4111-24. PubMed ID: 16177534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analytical equations for CT dose profiles derived using a scatter kernel of Monte Carlo parentage with broad applicability to CT dosimetry problems.
    Dixon RL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4251-64. PubMed ID: 21859027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams.
    Chung H; Prado KL; Yi BY
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(4):951-60. PubMed ID: 24503449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of initial electron beam parameters on Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for radiotherapy photon beams.
    Tzedakis A; Damilakis JE; Mazonakis M; Stratakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):907-13. PubMed ID: 15125009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Monte Carlo calculations of scatter dose for small field sizes in a 60Co beam.
    Kijewski PK; Bjärngard BE; Petti PL
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3951412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dose-rate distribution under partially shielded beams.
    Malicki J; Lobodziec W; Slosarek K
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Nov; 166(11):733-7. PubMed ID: 2260011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Photon-beam subsource sensitivity to the initial electron-beam parameters.
    Fix MK; Keall PJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1164-75. PubMed ID: 15895600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dose calculations for arbitrarily shaped electron beams.
    Bruinvis IA; van Amstel A; Elevelt AJ; van der Laarse R
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 364():73-9. PubMed ID: 6316744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.