102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 46034)
1. Ethics of selective treatment of spina bifida. Report by a working party.
Lancet; 1975 Jan; 1(7898):85-8. PubMed ID: 46034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parents, physicians, and spina bifida.
Darling RB
Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):10-4. PubMed ID: 330457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spina bifida: the fate of the untreated.
Reid R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 330459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The prognosis for babies with meningomyelocele and high lumbar paraplegia at birth. Comment by an ethical working group.
Lancet; 1985 Nov; 2(8462):996-7. PubMed ID: 2865511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selective nontreatment and spina bifida: a case study in ethical theory and application.
Johnson PR
Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(2):91-111. PubMed ID: 11645467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The anguish of decision-on the birth of a severely handicapped infant.
Reich WT; Smith H
Hastings Cent Rep; 1973 Sep; 3(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 4607566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-treatment of defective newborn babies.
Lancet; 1979 Nov; 2(8152):1123-4. PubMed ID: 91849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Questionable basis for 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' as the criterion for the active termination of life in newborns with spina bifida].
Kompanje EJ; de Jong TH; Arts WF; Rotteveel JJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Sep; 149(37):2067-9. PubMed ID: 16184950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical and social aspects of treatment of spina bifida.
Zachary RB
Lancet; 1968 Aug; 2(7562):274-6. PubMed ID: 4173698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A new look at spina bifida aperta.
MacKeith RC
Dev Med Child Neurol; 1971 Jun; 13(3):277-8. PubMed ID: 4937368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tube feedings and persistent vegetative state patients: ordinary or extraordinary means?
Clark P
Christ Bioeth; 2006 Apr; 12(1):43-64. PubMed ID: 16830413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spina bifida: the surgeon's responsibility.
Eckstein H
Doc Med Ethics; 1974 Apr 1974, 4 p 3; No():. PubMed ID: 11662938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The terminally ill--secular and Jewish ethical aspects.
Steinberg A
Isr J Med Sci; 1994 Jan; 30(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 8138389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
Rhoden NK; Arras JD
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective treatment of myelomeningocele: To treat or not to treat?
Lorber J
Pediatrics; 1974 Mar; 53(3):307-8. PubMed ID: 4592677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Child welfare services for the catastrophically ill newborn: Part II--A guiding ethical paradigm.
Hughes RC
Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 8404247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intended goals and appropriate treatment: an alternative to the ordinary/extraordinary distinction.
Meyers C
J Med Ethics; 1984 Sep; 10(3):128-30. PubMed ID: 6502637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
Smith SR
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
