139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4603993)
1. A controlled clinical comparison of the analgesic efficacy of ethoheptazine, propoxyphene and placebo.
Wang RI
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1974; 7(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 4603993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A double-blind comparison of ethoheptazine citrate, propoxyphene hydrochloride, and placebo.
Winter L; Calman HI; Caruso WA; Post A
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1973 Jul; 15(7):383-90. PubMed ID: 4198299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A controlled study of a new analgesic (Z867) in post-operative urological patients.
Rottichieri D
Int J Clin Pharmacol; 1972 Nov; 6(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 4565832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-blind study of the analgesic effect of ethoheptazine-aspirin.
Lamphier T; Rodriguez A; Richards D
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1974 Jul; 16(7):718-33. PubMed ID: 4210461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A new method for assessing the clinical effects of oral analgesic drugs.
Jick H; Slone D; Shapiro S; Lewis GP; Siskind V
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1971; 12(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 4936035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analgesic effects of d-propoxyphene napsylate for the pain following tooth extraction--comparison of Sedes and placebo in the double blind study].
Shiba R; Nakajo N; Goto S; Kodama H
Masui; 1972 Jan; 21(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 5063389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of musculoskeletal pain and associated anxiety with an ethoheptazine-aspirin-meprobamate combination (equagesic): a controlled study.
Scheiner JJ; Richards DJ
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1974 Sep; 16(9):928-36. PubMed ID: 4214668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The analgesic activity of propoxyphene napsylate with and without aspirin.
Wang RI; Sandoval RG
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1971; 11(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 4932749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical testing of a new analgesic combination on cancer patients in chronic pain].
Frankendal B
Lakartidningen; 1973 Mar; 70(10):949-51. PubMed ID: 4572816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of marketed analgesic drugs.
Moertel CG; Ahmann DL; Taylor WF; Schwartau N
N Engl J Med; 1972 Apr; 286(15):813-5. PubMed ID: 4110992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral analgesic drugs.
Lancet; 1972 Jun; 1(7765):1378. PubMed ID: 4113575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Propoxyphene hydrochloride. A critical review.
Miller RR; Feingold A; Paxinos J
JAMA; 1970 Aug; 213(6):996-1006. PubMed ID: 4914209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of naproxen and propoxyphene in patients with pain after orthopedic surgery.
Ruedy J; McCullough W
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl; 1973; 2():56-9. PubMed ID: 4590051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative analgesic study of propoxyphene, fenoprofen, the combination of propoxyphene and fenoprofen, aspirin, and placebo.
Sunshine A; Slafta J; Gruber C
J Clin Pharmacol; 1978; 18(11-12):556-63. PubMed ID: 363751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of propoxyphene HCl (Darvon) and an analgesic mixture (Percogesic) in pain relief after gingivectomy.
Cantor M
J Oral Ther Pharmacol; 1967 Nov; 4(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 4384014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mild analgesics evaluated with the "Submaximum Effort Tourniquet Technique". I. The influence of psychological factors on their effect.
Adler R; Lomazzi F
Psychopharmacologia; 1974; 38(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 4610614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-blind comparison of meptazinol (200 mg) and dextropropoxyphene/paracetamol in a multi-centre, general practice setting.
Price RK; Latham AN
Curr Med Res Opin; 1982; 8(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7049585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relieving postoperative pain: comparison between two analgetics and placebo].
Haeger K
Lakartidningen; 1970 Mar; 67(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 5430086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of acetaminophen, propoxyphene, and their combination in office practice.
Messick RT
J Clin Pharmacol; 1979 Apr; 19(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 374428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A double-blind comparison of meptazinol with placebo in postoperative pain.
Hedges A; Rose J; Leighton M; Turner P
J Clin Pharmacol; 1977; 17(2-3):125-7. PubMed ID: 319122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
