These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4604858)

  • 1. Optimization of cancer detection.
    Moore DH
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1974 Jul; 22(7):663-7. PubMed ID: 4604858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quantimet cytoscreen and the interactive approach to cancer screening.
    Husain OA; Allen RW; Hawkins EJ; Taylor JE
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1974 Jul; 22(7):678-84. PubMed ID: 4137291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance testing for automated prescreening devices in cervical cytology.
    Bartels PH; Wied GL
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1974 Jul; 22(7):660-2. PubMed ID: 4853581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of coherent optical processing techniques for the automatic screening of cervical cytologic samples.
    Kopp RE; Lisa J; Mendelsohn J; Pernick B; Stone H; Wohlers R
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1974 Jul; 22(7):598-604. PubMed ID: 4137305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and evaluation of automatic nucleus finding routines: thresholding of cervical cytology images.
    Taylor J; Bahr GF; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Richards DL; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 1096517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic marker displays for intermediate cells from the uterine cervix.
    Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Dytch HE; Pishotta FT; Yamauchi K; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 6950623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A measurement of the pattern of normal and malignant cervical cells.
    McMaster GW
    Acta Cytol; 1968; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 5238966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Possibilities of using computer analysis in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
    Wiśniewski L; Skawiński W; Makowski T; Jezuita J
    Ginekol Pol; 1980 Oct; 51(10):951-7. PubMed ID: 7005032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison between a computerized morphometric analysis and microscopic observation of exfoliative cytology of the uterine cervix].
    Pancino O; Tsuroplis E; Mollica G; Battaglia G
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1986 Feb; 62(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 3521678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient classification based on cytologic sample profiles. I. Basic measures for profile construction.
    Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Richards DL; Sychra JJ; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 281828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic screening of Papanicolaou stained cervical smears with the T. A. S.
    Meyer F; van Driel A
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1980; Suppl 4():82-95. PubMed ID: 6157078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fundamental study of automatic cytoscreening for uterine cancer. V. Data analysis for imporvement of CYBEST.
    Tanaka N; Ikeda H; Ueno T; Watanabe S; Imasato Y; Kashida R
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):536-8. PubMed ID: 333841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the MAGISCAN image analyser in automated uterine cancer cytology.
    Pycock D; Taylor CJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Sep; 2(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 7425440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental study of automatic cytoscreening for uterine cancer. IV. Sample requirements for CYBEST and simulation test of cell dispersion.
    Tanaka N; Ikeda H; Ueno T; Watanabe S; Imasato Y; Tsunekawa S
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 333840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Current methods for optimization of the cervical cancer diagnosis].
    Atanasova D
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2011; 50 Suppl 2():3-7. PubMed ID: 22524130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative comparison of slide and suspension technique for acridine orange staining of human cells.
    Wheeless LL; Patten SF; Onderdonk MA
    Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 4129939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A statistical approach to the classification of biological cells from their diffraction patterns.
    Genter FC; Salzman GC
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):268-72. PubMed ID: 374584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capabilities of nonlinear gradient and a thresholding algorithm for the segmentation of Papanicolaou-stained cervical cells.
    Abmayr W; Abele L; Kugler J; Borst H
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Sep; 2(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 7425442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary Melanoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Case Report, With Key Points on Recognition and Pathological Diagnosis.
    Lim KH; Tay SK; Ng AX; Mantoo S
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Jan; 21(1):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 27643451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of grey-level histograms as a method of classifying cells from the uterine cervix.
    Holmquist J; Bengtsson E; Olsen B; Stenkvist B; Noguchi Y
    Comput Biol Med; 1976 Jul; 6(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 786542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.