These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4604858)

  • 21. Interpretation of changes in the uterine cervix.
    Lancet; 1969 May; 1(7601):927-9. PubMed ID: 4180903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of serial histological examination of surgical specimens in cases of cervical carcinoma].
    Remotti G; De Virgiliis G; Rainoldi R; Bortolozzi G
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1977; 98(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 322569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Primary malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix.
    Khurana A; Jalpota Y
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2009; 52(4):575-6. PubMed ID: 19805980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Slit-scan cytofluorometry: basis for an automated cytopathology prescreening system.
    Wheeless LL; Patten SF
    Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):391-4. PubMed ID: 4583034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Cervical endoscopy in the diagnosis of the initial stages of cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Novikova EG; Sorokin SZ
    Sov Med; 1991; (3):86-9. PubMed ID: 1882307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Image analysis system of normal and cancer cells proceeding from cervical smears (author's transl)].
    Laurent JL; Beraud JC; Antoniadis A; Berruyer J; Jourlin M; Azema J; Haour P
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1979; 27(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 526059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating false positive and false negative error rates in cervical cell classification.
    Oliver LH; Poulsen RS; Toussaint GT
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1977 Jul; 25(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 330723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An unusual presentation of Wegener disease of the cervix: presenting as cervical cancer.
    Oladipo A; Sathiyathasan S; Thomas S; Jeyanthan K; Hakeem-Habeeb Y
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Oct; 15(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 21959576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The costs of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Schneider J; Twiggs LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Dec; 40(6):851-9. PubMed ID: 4636915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Correlation between the cytology, coposcopy and the histopathology of abnormal lesions of the cervix].
    Michon B; Demianczuk N
    Union Med Can; 1977 May; 106(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 867611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical cytology: descriptive statistics for nuclei of normal and atypical cell types.
    Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Bahr GF; Taylor J; Wied GL
    Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 4517960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of single-cell classification schemes for computer classification of cervical cells.
    Poulsen RS; Oliver LH; Toussaint GT; Louis C
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 7294540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Segmentation of Papanicolaou smear images.
    Lin YK; Fu KS
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 7294539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reappraisal of endocervical curettage in predicting cervical involvement by endometrial carcinoma.
    Chen SS; Lee L
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Jan; 31(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 3950883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Histocytochemical study of iodine positive and negative zones of the cervix uteri].
    Carbia Aguilar E; Márquez Monter H
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1972 Sep; 32(191):299-308. PubMed ID: 5074245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automatic identification and measurement of cells by computer.
    Rosenberg SA; Ledeen KS; Kline T
    Science; 1969 Mar; 163(3871):1065-7. PubMed ID: 5764867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Electron-microscopical examinations of the cervix uteri].
    Bonilla-Musoles F
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1969; 8(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 5407898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Significance of microabrasions in the diagnosis of diseases of the uterine cervix].
    Holub Z; Vorácek J; Tretiník P
    Cesk Gynekol; 1990 Feb; 55(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 2136413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [THe role of biopsy in the early diagnosis of cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Buţureanu S; Pricop F; Stratan E; Rădulescu D; Patraş C; Dragomir D; Dumitrache F; Gheorghiţă V; Popovici C; Popovici R
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1990; 94(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 2075312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears.
    Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; Hontz A; Lo Sciuto L
    Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 4526248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.