149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4609813)
1. [Prognosis of tooth substitution by metal implants].
Kovács DG
Fogorv Sz; 1974 Nov; 67(11):329-33. PubMed ID: 4609813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On implantable materials.
Ashman A
N Y J Dent; 1974; 44(6):180-5. PubMed ID: 4597160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cementation of dental implants: rationale and preliminary observations.
Zarb GA; Melcher AH; Smith DC
J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1972 Sep; 38(9):328-32. PubMed ID: 4562091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Review of implantation materials].
Newesely H
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Aug; 34(8):650-4. PubMed ID: 290486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Microstructure of the surfaces of dental implantations].
Mühlemann HR
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1975 Jan; 85(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 1089306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reaction of oral tissues to oral implants].
Papathanasiou B
Stomatologia (Athenai); 1979; 36(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 392816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Coating materials in dental implants].
Antonopoulos AN
Stomatologia (Athenai); 1972; 29(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 4563036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of animal models in research on dental implants.
Natiella JR
J Dent Educ; 1988 Dec; 52(12):792-7. PubMed ID: 3057025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Biocompatibility and biofunctional efficiency of oral implants].
Mpochlogyros PN
Stomatologia (Athenai); 1979; 36(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 293951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vivo method for the biological evaluation of metal implants.
Keller JC; Marshall GW; Kaminski EJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Sep; 18(7):829-44. PubMed ID: 6544782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The connection of the dental implants].
Loukopoulos N
Stomatologia (Athenai); 1972; 29(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 4562646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prosthetics of metallic implants].
Papathanasios S
Stomatologia (Athenai); 1972; 29(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 4562647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Histological studies on intramucosal implant buttons].
Fakhry T
Odontoprotesi; 1975; (4):8-10. PubMed ID: 801768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The present status of endosteal oral implants.
Cranin AN; Dennison TA; Schnitman P
J Biomed Mater Res; 1974; 8(4 Pt 2):385-90. PubMed ID: 4416428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biometallic and cytotoxicologic studies of implants].
Sandhaus S
Zahnarztl Prax; 1976 Jan; 27(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 1076940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biological tolerance of metal and bone].
Galanos P; Metsou A; Giannikas A
Stomatologia (Athenai); 1972; 29(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 4564834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium endosteal dental implants in the mandibles of dogs: preliminary studies.
Richards LW; Gourley IM; Cordy DR
J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Feb; 31(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 4589185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Address given at the opening of the 15th International Seminar of Dental Implants in Paris, Lariboi sière Hospital, Tuesday, November 12, 1974].
Rodallec
Promot Dent; 1974; 7(26):7-11. PubMed ID: 4535157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State of the art in dental implants.
Hulbert SF; Bennett JT
J Dent Res; 1975 Jun; 54 Spec No B():B153-7. PubMed ID: 1055740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ceramic-coated subperiosteal implants. I. A pilot study.
Reisbick MH; Benson D
J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Feb; 31(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 4203811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
