These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4611404)

  • 1. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials.
    Henry PJ; Harnist DJ
    Aust Dent J; 1974 Jun; 19(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 4611404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions.
    Cooney JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The accuracy of post-impressions with silicone-rubber impression materials and polysulfide-rubber impression materials].
    Aoyama S; Sano Y; Enomoto M; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 6935848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Technical development of a silicone impression method. Application of copper-bonded individualized trays].
    Takesue H
    Shikai Tenbo; 1984 Jul; 64(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 6390749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Dimensional characteristics in various impression methods with viscoelastic materials for inlays, crowns and bridges].
    Dumfahrt H; Schäffer H
    Z Stomatol; 1987 Sep; 84(5):231-9. PubMed ID: 3328940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of material bulk and undercuts on the accuracy of impression materials.
    de Araujo PA; Jorgensen KD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):791-4. PubMed ID: 3908659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB; Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 3522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polyether, polysulfide and silicone rubber impression materials. 2: accuracy of silverplated dies.
    Vermilyea SG; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1975 Dec; 57(12):405-10. PubMed ID: 1073921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An update on elastomeric impression materials.
    Brown D
    Br Dent J; 1981 Jan; 150(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 7006650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models.
    Johnson GH; Craig RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Apr; 53(4):484-90. PubMed ID: 3889281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures].
    Lamy M; Mainjot A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Silver plating rubber base material for superior dies and casts.
    Markley MR; Krug RS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1969 Jul; 22(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 4891746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Complete impressions with thiokol elastomers using customized chambered impression trays in fixed dentures].
    Dumont A
    J Dent Que; 1984 Jan; 21():47-53. PubMed ID: 6379005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of accuracy and the time-dependent dimensional stability of silicone based impression materials].
    Yavuzyilmaz H; Dinçer C; Nalbant L
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):425-8. PubMed ID: 2489491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part I: Condensation silicones.
    Lacy AM; Bellman T; Fukui H; Jendresen MD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Feb; 45(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 7009840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)].
    Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.