These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4612140)
1. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions. Cooney JP J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of impression-die systems on crown margins. Plekavich EJ; Joncas JM J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):772-6. PubMed ID: 6348258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions. Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials. Fusayama T; Iwaku M; Daito K; Nurosaki N; Takatsu T J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 4612141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes. Nilner K; Owall B Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials. Henry PJ; Harnist DJ Aust Dent J; 1974 Jun; 19(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 4611404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Silver plating rubber base material for superior dies and casts. Markley MR; Krug RS J Prosthet Dent; 1969 Jul; 22(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 4891746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of material bulk and undercuts on the accuracy of impression materials. de Araujo PA; Jorgensen KD J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):791-4. PubMed ID: 3908659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Copper electroplating of non-aqueous elastomeric impression materials: a subjective appraisal of their platability. Payne JA; Jeganathan S Singapore Dent J; 1994 Jan; 19(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9582678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials. Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of cervical discrepancy of gold crowns in stone dies from various impression materials]. Mantovani AV; Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2135328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Improvement of precision in cast restorations]. Marumori H Shikai Tenbo; 1983 Apr; 61(4):707-18. PubMed ID: 6346537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-fusing counterdies for measuring accuracy of dies or impression materials. Stackhouse JA; Yoon W; Von Hagen S J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Feb; 71(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8126680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions]. Daito K Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]