These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4620854)

  • 1. [Statistical evaluation of success and reasons for failure in 700 endosseous blade implants done in the office].
    Koch WL
    Orale Implantol; 1974 Apr; 1(1):105-38. PubMed ID: 4620854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term clinical study with endosseous implants. 1. Surgical advances (I)].
    Gysi BE; Strub JR; Schärer P
    Quintessenz; 1981 May; 32(5):835-46. PubMed ID: 7045941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Statistical evaluation of 952 endosseous implants].
    Cranin AN; Rabkin MF; Garfinkel L
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1978 Jan; 47(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 280934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Linkow-blade-vents in the office. Experience report of endosseous blade implants].
    Myska W
    Orale Implantol; 1974 Nov; 1(2):53-92. PubMed ID: 4620856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current evaluation of dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Nomura T; Shingaki S; Nakajima T
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(3-4):175-92. PubMed ID: 10186964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success and survivability of endosteal blade implants managed in the practice of Dr. Linkow.
    Aceveco AI
    J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(3):488-91. PubMed ID: 3334677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective investigation of the single-crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: ten-year results.
    Steflik DE; Koth DL; Robinson FG; McKinney RV; Davis BC; Morris CF; Davis QB
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 7473873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blade-vent implants need more research.
    Bird A
    Dent Stud; 1976 May; 54(8):106-8. PubMed ID: 1077954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation data from a comparative dental implant investigation in dogs.
    Steflik DE; White SL; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Schoen SP; Lake FT; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 8120937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between endosseous metal blade-vent and endosseous polymer-coated metal blade-vent implants when used as distal abutment for removable appliances in free-end saddle cases.
    El-Mahady AS; Amin M; Fahmy TH; Abbas NA
    Egypt Dent J; 1984 Apr; 30(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 6399032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Long-term clinical study with endosseous implants. 1. Surgical measures (II)].
    Gysi BE; Strub JR; Scharer P
    Quintessenz; 1981 Jun; 32(6):1025-31. PubMed ID: 7045944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: immediate versus delayed implantation.
    Ribeiro FS; Pontes AE; Marcantonio E; Piattelli A; Neto RJ; Marcantonio E
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18332764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Biesbrock AR; Edgerton M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 8530174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 1- to 12-year clinical evaluation of 106 endosseous implants supporting fixed and removable prostheses.
    Aykent F; Inan O; Ozyesil AG; Alptekin NO
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Aug; 27(4):358-67. PubMed ID: 17726992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of implant interdependency when evaluating success rates: a statistical analysis of multicenter results.
    Herrmann I; Lekholm U; Holm S; Karlsson S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 10371919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endosseous blade implants: how and why.
    Zuckerman J
    Dent Surv; 1980 Aug; 56(8):42-4. PubMed ID: 6935131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dental implantation problems. Initial animal experiment studies of coated titanium blade implants: methodological procedure and the clinical results].
    Knöfler W; Hampel H; Bethmann W
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Mar; 31(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 6942554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical experience with endosseous aluminum oxide ceramic implants].
    Wörle M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981 Sep; 36(9):591-5. PubMed ID: 7028457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of endosseous blade implants in narrow anterior spaces].
    Strassl H
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1980 Jan; 31(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 6933774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Private practice results of screw-type tapered implants: survival and evaluation of risk factors.
    Mundt T; Mack F; Schwahn C; Biffar R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 16955613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.