205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 462138)
1. Evaluations of dangerousness.
Kress F
Schizophr Bull; 1979; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A note on the meaning of the Donaldson decision.
Reinert RE
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 457050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
Linburn GE
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
Hiday VA; Markell SJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 7275438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dangerousness: legal determinations and clinical speculations.
Birns H; Levien JS
Psychiatr Q; 1980; 52(2):108-31. PubMed ID: 7403374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
Behnke SH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
Kopolow LE
Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental health commitment: the state of the debate, 1980.
Roth LG
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 31(6):385-96. PubMed ID: 7380401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of the Donaldson decision: a model for periodic review of committed patients.
Crane L; Zonana H; Wizner S
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 Nov; 28(11):827-33. PubMed ID: 410723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review.
Weiner BA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson.
Bernard JL
Am Psychol; 1977 Dec; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
Fields JD
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Redefining dangerousness for civil commitment.
Rachlin S
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Aug; 38(8):884-6. PubMed ID: 3610091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
Shuman D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
Neff RC
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Cleveland S
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 2912259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states.
Clayton T
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Involuntary admission--a century of experience.
Schwartz L
J Clin Psychiatry; 1982 Jan; 43(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7054153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right not to be a false positive: problems in the application of the dangerousness standard.
Steadman HJ
Psychiatr Q; 1980; 52(2):84-99. PubMed ID: 7403378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychiatric evaluation of dangerousness in two trial court jurisdictions.
Forst ML
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 912126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
