These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 462138)

  • 1. Evaluations of dangerousness.
    Kress F
    Schizophr Bull; 1979; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on the meaning of the Donaldson decision.
    Reinert RE
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 457050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
    Hiday VA; Markell SJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 7275438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dangerousness: legal determinations and clinical speculations.
    Birns H; Levien JS
    Psychiatr Q; 1980; 52(2):108-31. PubMed ID: 7403374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
    Behnke SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
    Kopolow LE
    Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental health commitment: the state of the debate, 1980.
    Roth LG
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 31(6):385-96. PubMed ID: 7380401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of the Donaldson decision: a model for periodic review of committed patients.
    Crane L; Zonana H; Wizner S
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 Nov; 28(11):827-33. PubMed ID: 410723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review.
    Weiner BA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Bernard JL
    Am Psychol; 1977 Dec; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Redefining dangerousness for civil commitment.
    Rachlin S
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Aug; 38(8):884-6. PubMed ID: 3610091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
    Shuman D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
    Neff RC
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
    Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Cleveland S
    Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 2912259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states.
    Clayton T
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary admission--a century of experience.
    Schwartz L
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1982 Jan; 43(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7054153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right not to be a false positive: problems in the application of the dangerousness standard.
    Steadman HJ
    Psychiatr Q; 1980; 52(2):84-99. PubMed ID: 7403378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The psychiatric evaluation of dangerousness in two trial court jurisdictions.
    Forst ML
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 912126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.