These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 46224)

  • 1. Long-term results with the Björk-Shiley tilting disk valve in aortic valvular disease.
    Björk VO; Henze A; Holmgren A
    Isr J Med Sci; 1975; 11(2-3):161-72. PubMed ID: 46224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc valve in isolated aortic valvular disease.
    Björk VO; Henze A; Holmgren A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1974 Sep; 68(3):393-404. PubMed ID: 4136738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five years experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in isolated aortic valvular disease.
    Björk VO; Henze A; Holmgren A
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1975; 16(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 1194329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in aortic valvular disease.
    Henze A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1974; 14(0):1-33. PubMed ID: 4528077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative hemodynamic evaluation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc aortic valve.
    Larmi TK; Kairaluoma MI; Kärkölä P; Tuononen S; Nuutinen L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 May; 73(5):712-5. PubMed ID: 850428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and haemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Björk VO; Holmgren A; Olin C; Ovenfors CO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1971; 5(3):177-91. PubMed ID: 5135701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Björk VO
    Br Heart J; 1971; 33(Suppl):Suppl:42-6. PubMed ID: 5572645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical treatment of combined aortic and mitral valvular disease. A clinical, haemodynamic and experimental evaluation of the standard and convexo-concave models of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Aberg B
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1980; Suppl 25():1-60. PubMed ID: 6933689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Kay-Shiley disc valve prosthesis in the aortic position. Clinical and haemodynamic results, and experimental comparison with other prosthetic aortic valves.
    Olin C
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1970; 7():1-37. PubMed ID: 5283280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.
    Roscitano A; Benedetto U; Sciangula A; Merico E; Barberi F; Bianchini R; Tonelli E; Sinatra R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate and late results of aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve.
    Larsen A; Sivertsen E; Semb G
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 152973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
    Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
    Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The aortic Elan stentless aortic valve: excellent hemodynamics and ease of implantation.
    Flynn M; Iaccovoni A; Pathi V; Butler J; Macarthur KJ; Berg GA
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):48-54. PubMed ID: 11805949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Kato Y; Suehiro S; Shibata T; Sasaki Y; Hirai H
    J Card Surg; 2007; 22(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 17661773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Björk-Shiley-Monostrut prosthesis of the aortic valve. Mid-term development].
    Canivet P; Vitoux B; Vahanian A; Michel PL; Cormier B; Enriquez Sarano L; Richaud C; Acar J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1991 Jan; 84(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 2012486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Hemodynamic rest and stress studies following implantation of various aortic valve prostheses].
    Horstkotte D; Haerten K; Körfer R; Spiller P; Budde T; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Aug; 72(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 6624185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early postoperative outcome and hemodynamic performance of the sorin pericarbon stentless aortic valve.
    Bonacchi M; Giunti G; Prifti E; Rostagno C; Bini M; Frati G; Sani G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 12358408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
    Horstkotte D
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of intraoperative flow measurements and haemodynamic findings at follow-up in patients with different aortic disc valve prostheses.
    Nitter-Hauge S; Levang OW; Semb BK
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 6679012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.