These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 462241)

  • 1. [Dosage-reduced mammography. Comparative studies between the Kodak Definix Medical and Kodak Min R films].
    Ellegast HH; Strasser E
    Rontgenpraxis; 1979 Jun; 32(6):143-8. PubMed ID: 462241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Suggestions for standardisation of dose measurements and dose recording during mammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 6452373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [First results of mammography with a screen film (author's transl)].
    Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Strahlentherapie; 1979 Jan; 155(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 760273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
    Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland].
    Iwaszkiewicz K; Bończyk J
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1991 Apr 22-29; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography (and radiology?) is still plagued with poor quality in photographic processing and darkroom fog.
    Gray JE
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):318-9. PubMed ID: 8153299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose reduction in mammography.
    Mintzer RA; Matthies HJ; Lin PP; Neiman HL; Rogers LF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Jan; 146(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 618496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter: Variation of skin dose in mammography--a comparison of blue X-ray film (Medichrome) with conventional black and white (Kodak PE 4006).
    Stillman J; Palmer K
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Mar; 48(567):228-9. PubMed ID: 1125552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dose requirement and definition of the image with new types of mammographic systems (author's transl)].
    Frost D; Krause RA
    Strahlentherapie; 1980 Nov; 156(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 7434387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical radiography and photography.
    Med Radiogr Photogr; 1985; 61(4):1-24. PubMed ID: 4079704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Data on the radiation exposure of the breast in mammography. Studies on a group of 1593 female patients].
    Giera W; Paterok EM; Prestele H; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rontgenpraxis; 1982 Dec; 35(12):445-53. PubMed ID: 7157088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeat exposures: our little secret.
    McKinney WE
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 7755686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality criteria and quality control in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():63-75. PubMed ID: 2860867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interest of a combination of film and screen reinforcer in mammography (author's transl)].
    Berry M; Clément JF; Daniel G
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Jan; 59(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 641872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
    Persliden J; Fransson V; Vitak B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technological improvements in mammography over the past 20 years.
    Haus AG
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8302212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mammography: films, grids and radiation dosage].
    Andersson I
    Lakartidningen; 1977 Apr; 74(16):1596-7. PubMed ID: 853796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Picture quality and dose requirements in mammography].
    Kuhn H; Stahl J
    Rontgenpraxis; 1979 Jan; 32(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 419414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. User experience network. The R2 ImageChecker may produce erratic results when processing Kodak Min-R EV mammography films.
    Health Devices; 2004 Nov; 33(11):410-1. PubMed ID: 15615101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.