These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The estimation of relative potency from two parabolas in symmetric bioassays. Williams DA Biometrics; 1973 Dec; 29(4):695-700. PubMed ID: 4785234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-parametric interval estimation of relative potency for dilution assays, including the case of non-monotone dosage response curves. Mantel N; Schneiderman MA Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):619-32. PubMed ID: 1174621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dose-response model incorporating nonlinear kinetics. Van Ryzin J; Rai K Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 3567309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The role of the biometrician in dosage finding]. Schneider B Arzneimittelforschung; 1977 Feb; 27(2A):257-64. PubMed ID: 577172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing dose responses on proportions near zero or one with the jackknife. Salsburg D Biometrics; 1971 Dec; 27(4):1035-41. PubMed ID: 5138932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methodology of calculation of the relationship concentration (dose) - time - effect of general toxic effect of xenobiotics on organism from the point of view of chemical and biologic kinetics]. Pavlov VN Gig Sanit; 1994; (8):52-5. PubMed ID: 7750769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fitting a general sigmoid model to pharmacological response curves [proceedings]. Davey A; Marriott A; Stockham MA Br J Pharmacol; 1976 Oct; 58(2):289P-290P. PubMed ID: 974407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Utilization of analog computers in the development of dosage forms]. Frömming KH; Lippold B; Garrett ER Mitt Dtsch Pharm Ges Pharm Ges DDR; 1971 Sep; 41(9):205-47. PubMed ID: 4939073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose-response characteristics of uterine responses in rats exposed to estrogen agonists. Barton HA; Andersen ME; Allen BC Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 9927563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian approach to bioassay. Ramsey FL Biometrics; 1972 Sep; 28(3):841-58. PubMed ID: 5073256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of the limit of detection for quantal response bioassays. van den Heuvel E Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 21574241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Parallel line assay with successive adjustment of doses. Finney DJ; Schild HO Br J Pharmacol Chemother; 1966 Oct; 28(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 5972622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of two approaches to the construction of models for quantal responses to mixtures of drugs. Plackett RL; Hewlett PS Biometrics; 1967 Mar; 23(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 6050470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [An analytical variant of the rapid "one-point method" for determining mean effective doses]. Prozorovskiĭ VB; Frumin GT Eksp Klin Farmakol; 1992; 55(6):61-3. PubMed ID: 1305883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. On two tests for comparing matched proportions. Nam JM Biometrics; 1971 Dec; 27(4):945-59. PubMed ID: 5138938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]