These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 463862)

  • 1. Temporal and regional variation in hysterectomy rates in the United States, 1970--1975.
    Walker AM; Jick H
    Am J Epidemiol; 1979 Jul; 110(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 463862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer of the corpus uteri: increasing incidence in the United States, 1970--1975.
    Walker AM; Jick H
    Am J Epidemiol; 1979 Jul; 110(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 463863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk estimates of hysterectomy and selected conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy.
    Merrill RM; Layman AB; Oderda G; Asche C
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18280923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterectomy prevalence and death rates for cervical cancer--United States, 1965-1988.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 Jan; 41(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 1728728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-specific hysterectomy and oophorectomy prevalence rates and the risks for cancer of the reproductive system.
    Howe HL
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Jun; 74(6):560-3. PubMed ID: 6721012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.
    Wu JM; Wechter ME; Geller EJ; Nguyen TV; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1091-5. PubMed ID: 17978124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence corrected hysterectomy rates and probabilities in Utah.
    Merrill RM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 11(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 11164129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of hysterectomy on the age-specific incidence of cervical and uterine cancer in Germany and other countries.
    Stang A
    Eur J Public Health; 2013 Oct; 23(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 22711786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland.
    Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzaga G; Brewster DH; Wild SH; Sivalingam VN
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 59():227-231. PubMed ID: 30836220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The temporal and age-dependent patterns of hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer incidence rates in Denmark: a population-based cohort study.
    Hammer A; Kahlert J; Rositch A; Pedersen L; Gravitt P; Blaakaer J; Soegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 27861705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates by age and indication in Germany 2005-2006.
    Stang A; Merrill RM; Kuss O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1193-200. PubMed ID: 22718096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands.
    Hanstede MM; Burger MJ; Timmermans A; Burger MP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 22043840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterectomy risk in premenopausal-aged military veterans: associations with sexual assault and gynecologic symptoms.
    Ryan GL; Mengeling MA; Summers KM; Booth BM; Torner JC; Syrop CH; Sadler AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):352.e1-352.e13. PubMed ID: 26475424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of prior hysterectomy in the Seattle-Tacoma area.
    Koepsell TD; Weiss NS; Thompson DJ; Martin DP
    Am J Public Health; 1980 Jan; 70(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 6965339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two methods based on cross-sectional data for correcting corpus uterine cancer incidence and probabilities.
    Merrill RM; Lyon JL; Wiggins C
    BMC Cancer; 2001; 1():13. PubMed ID: 11686855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a second opinion program on hysterectomy performance.
    Finkel ML; Finkel DJ
    Med Care; 1990 Sep; 28(9):776-83. PubMed ID: 2402172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in Hysteropexy and Apical Support for Uterovaginal Prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012.
    Madsen AM; Raker C; Sung VW
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(6):365-371. PubMed ID: 28723720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripartum hysterectomy in the United States: nationwide 14 year experience.
    Bateman BT; Mhyre JM; Callaghan WM; Kuklina EV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):63.e1-8. PubMed ID: 21982025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of endometrial ablation on hysterectomy rates in women with benign uterine conditions in the United States.
    Farquhar CM; Naoom S; Steiner CA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 12391955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.