These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4641233)

  • 1. [Responsibility of the surgeon].
    Ann Chir; 1972 Oct; 26(19):921-34. PubMed ID: 4641233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How is the responsibility of the surgeon to be really determined and defined in relation to responsibility of the anesthetist in surgical operations? (Expert testimony)].
    ENGISCH K
    Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir; 1961; 297():236-54. PubMed ID: 13696872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [On the professional responsibility of the surgeon for a foreign body left in the abdomen: expert testimony case].
    MASSARO O
    Minerva Medicoleg; 1962; 82():371-6. PubMed ID: 13933389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The thing does not speak for itself unless these three factors can be applied to the case.
    Horty JF
    Mod Hosp; 1973 Oct; 121(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 4786774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Medical malpractice in surgery I: Suspected malpractice and patterns of risks].
    Hansis ML
    Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Apr; 128(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 12700996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [On the problem of responsibility in the co-operation of anesthetist and surgeon].
    Schneider A; Thullen A
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1967 Aug; 46(8):584-7. PubMed ID: 5596118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Responsibility of the medical expert appointed by the court].
    Doll PJ
    Maroc Med; 1975 Apr; 55(589):183-93. PubMed ID: 1134124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Permission for the surgery in married minors. Responsibility for postoperative complications].
    Kohlhaas M
    Med Welt; 1968 May; 20():1318-9. PubMed ID: 5717763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Difficulties of surgical expert testimony].
    GULEKE N
    Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir; 1954; 279():137-41. PubMed ID: 13234467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Medical responsibility. Viewpoint of the jurist and the physician].
    Bréhant J
    Presse Med (1893); 1971 Jan; 79(6):257-8. PubMed ID: 5546797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The surgeon, the expert, the judge].
    Vayre P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1996 Dec; 180(9):2149-58; discussion 2158-61. PubMed ID: 9182002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Surgical complications and the legal expert medical evidence of attributability and causality].
    Vayre P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2005 May; 189(5):979-92. PubMed ID: 16433467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corporate responsibility for medical care.
    Chayet NL
    Hosp Prog; 1972 Jan; 53(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 5006933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The surgeon and his responsibilities].
    Gosset J
    Ann Chir; 1974 Jan; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 4820219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Trends of jurisprudence, with respect to medical responsibility, during the past 30 years].
    Kornprobst L
    Nouv Presse Med; 1973 Jul; 2(28):1874-8. PubMed ID: 4724383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Authority and responsability].
    Girault A
    Nouv Presse Med; 1973 Sep; 2(32):2133-5. PubMed ID: 4733918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical malpractice in surgery II: Ways of risk management].
    Hansis ML
    Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Apr; 128(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 12700997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Trends in jurisprudence over the last 30 years concerning medical responsibility. IV].
    Kornprobst L
    Nouv Presse Med; 1973 Sep; 2(31):2017-21. PubMed ID: 4730711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MALPRACTICE: necessity for expert testimony.
    J Am Med Assoc; 1952 Feb; 148(6):492. PubMed ID: 14888512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Necessity for expert testimony in malpractice actions.
    COLEMAN WT
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1951 Jan; 43(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 14804112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.