These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4641364)

  • 1. Postmasking recovery of human click action potentials and click loudness.
    Coats AC; Dickey JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1972 Dec; 52(6):1607-12. PubMed ID: 4641364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masking by internally generated noise and protection by middle ear muscle activity.
    Irvine DR; Clarey JC; Morton RE; Newman RG
    Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 10(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 6874606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures.
    Lombard RE; Straughan IR
    J Exp Biol; 1974 Aug; 61(1):71-93. PubMed ID: 4606567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efferent olivocochlear bundle: some relationships to noise masking and to stimulus attenuation.
    Dewson JH
    J Neurophysiol; 1967 Jul; 30(4):817-32. PubMed ID: 6035692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physiology of hearing.
    Eldredge DH; Miller JD
    Annu Rev Physiol; 1971; 33():281-310. PubMed ID: 4951051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The variability of single click evoked CAPs in the guinea pig as a function of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Aran JM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979; (9):167-78. PubMed ID: 294680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal summation of repetitive click stimuli.
    Darling RM; Price LL
    Ear Hear; 1989 Jun; 10(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2744253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiological correlates of auditory stimulus periodicity.
    Hind JE
    Audiology; 1972; 11(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 4206204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses.
    Ball LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):107-30. PubMed ID: 7187432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions from a nonvertebrate ear.
    Kössl M; Boyan GS
    Naturwissenschaften; 1998 Mar; 85(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 9562992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Erre JP; Aran JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):616-27. PubMed ID: 6841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between discharges in auditory nerve fibers and the whole-nerve response shown by forward masking: an empirical model for the AP.
    Dolan DF; Teas DC; Walton JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 6841798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audition.
    Harris JD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1972; 23():313-46. PubMed ID: 4552208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes.
    Parham K; Zhao HB; Kim DO
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 8836205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compound action potentials recorded intracranially from the auditory nerve in man.
    Møller AR; Jannetta PJ
    Exp Neurol; 1981 Dec; 74(3):862-74. PubMed ID: 7308375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia.
    Cullen JK; Ellis MS; Berlin CI; Lousteau RJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972; 74(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 5068755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery of the human compound action potential following prior stimulation.
    Murnane OD; Prieve BA; Relkin EM
    Hear Res; 1998 Oct; 124(1-2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9822915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dependence of rapid hearing adaptation on the interstimulus time interval and on the intensity of acoustic signals].
    Bazarov VG; Chaĭka SP; Moroz BS; Chudnovskiĭ SI; Poliakov AN
    Fiziol Zh (1978); 1987; 33(2):19-24. PubMed ID: 3582682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arousal effects on cochlear potentials: investigation of a two-factor hypothesis.
    Irvine DR; Webster WR
    Brain Res; 1972 Apr; 39(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 4337198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distribution of VIII nerve excitation by pure tones, derived by electrical stimulation and acoustic masking.
    Aran JM; Erre JP; Hiel H; Goeury P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 103(5-6):593-601. PubMed ID: 3618186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.