BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4643777)

  • 1. Visual scanning strategies of reflective, impulsive, fast-accurate, and slow-inaccurate children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.
    Ault RL; Crawford DE; Jeffrey WE
    Child Dev; 1972 Dec; 43(4):1412-7. PubMed ID: 4643777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and modification of search strategies of impulsive and reflective children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.
    Zelniker T; Jeffrey WE; Ault R; Parsons J
    Child Dev; 1972 Jun; 43(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 5034724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Problem-solving strategies of reflective, impulsive, fast-accurate, and slow-inaccurate children.
    Ault RL
    Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 4705553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training impulsive children in the use of more efficient scanning techniques.
    Egeland B
    Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 4820269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reflection-impulsivity and reading recognition ability among mildly retarded children.
    Hayes CS; Prinz RJ; Siders C
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Sep; 81(2):194-6. PubMed ID: 788516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategy differences between reflective and impulsive children.
    Adams WV
    Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):1076-80. PubMed ID: 5056602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infants' visual attention to varying degrees of novelty.
    Welch MJ
    Child Dev; 1974 Jun; 45(2):344-50. PubMed ID: 4837712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflective and impulsive children: strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving.
    Zelniker T; Jeffrey WE
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1976; 41(5):1-59. PubMed ID: 1030779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental changes in infant visual preferences for novelty and familiarity.
    Wetherford MJ; Cohen LB
    Child Dev; 1973 Sep; 44(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 4730528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Matching familiar figures test: a unidimensional measure of reflection-impulsivity?
    O'Donnell JP; Paulsen KA; McGann JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1247-53. PubMed ID: 745908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What ever happened to the norms for the Matching Familiar Figures Test?
    Walker NW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1235-42. PubMed ID: 3808898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotionality as a moderator of cognitive style on the Matching Familiar Figures Test in adults.
    Davidson WB
    J Pers Assess; 1988; 52(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 3210123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences between reflective and impulsive children in tempo and quality of decision making.
    Mann L
    Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 4705554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Visual selectivity in infants. Study of visual preference for new images in normal infants].
    Stoleru S; François R
    Arch Fr Pediatr; 1982 Nov; 39(9):709-11. PubMed ID: 7165468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impulsivity-reflectivity and children's intellectual performance.
    Brannigan GG; Ash T; Margolis H
    J Pers Assess; 1980 Feb; 44(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 7359306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Color, form, and function as dimensions of natural classification: developmental changes in eye movements, reaction time, and response strategies.
    Farnham-Diggory S; Gregg LW
    Child Dev; 1975 Mar; 46(1):101-14. PubMed ID: 1132264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Judgement of identity or non-identity between drawings and oculomotive exploration in 5-7 year old children].
    Vurpillot E; Taranne P
    Annee Psychol; 1974; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 4409932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An examination of Kagan's risk hypothesis for conceptual tempo.
    Buchanan JP
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1983 Feb; 107(First Half):135-42. PubMed ID: 6840535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information processing and the modification of an "impulsive conceptual tempo".
    Heider ER
    Child Dev; 1971 Oct; 42(4):1276-81. PubMed ID: 5157116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuity in the development of visual behavior in young infants.
    Barten S; Ronch J
    Child Dev; 1971 Nov; 42(5):1566-71. PubMed ID: 5156652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.