These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 464781)

  • 1. EMG needle electrodes: electrical impedance.
    Wiechers DO; Blood JR; Stow RW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1979 Aug; 60(8):364-9. PubMed ID: 464781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical impedance of stainless steel needle electrodes.
    Kalvøy H; Tronstad C; Nordbotten B; Grimnes S; Martinsen ØG
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jul; 38(7):2371-82. PubMed ID: 20217478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The selection of electromyographic needle electrodes.
    Joynt RL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Mar; 75(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 8129574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recording characteristics of electrical impedance-electromyography needle electrodes.
    Kwon H; Di Cristina JF; Rutkove SB; Sanchez B
    Physiol Meas; 2018 May; 39(5):055005. PubMed ID: 29616985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multifrequency characteristics of disposable and nondisposable EMG needle electrodes.
    Ackmann JJ; Lomas JN; Hoffmann RG; Wertsch JJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Jun; 16(6):616-23. PubMed ID: 8502259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical properties of commercial concentric EMG electrodes.
    Dorfman LJ; McGill KC; Cummins KL
    Muscle Nerve; 1985 Jan; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 4058452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recording and physical characteristics of disposable concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Tedman B; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Oct; 13(10):909-14. PubMed ID: 2233847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity for detecting fibrillation potentials: a comparison between concentric and monopolar needle electrodes.
    Sherman HB; Walker FO; Donofrio PD
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Nov; 13(11):1023-6. PubMed ID: 2233858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ex vivo experiment of saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar radiofrequency ablation with a perfused needle electrode: comparison with conventional monopolar and simultaneous monopolar modes.
    Lee JM; Kim SH; Han JK; Sohn KL; Choi BI
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 15789259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impedance analysis of bio-fuel cell electrodes.
    Ouitrakul S; Sriyudthsak M; Charojrochkul S; Kakizono T
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2007 Dec; 23(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 17897820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in pain perception in women using concentric and monopolar needles.
    Balbierz JM; Petajan JH; Alder SC; Vlach SA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1403-6. PubMed ID: 17023253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated measurement of intestinal mucosa electrical parameters using a new digital clamp.
    Mathieu J; Mammar S; Eto B
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 30(8):591-8. PubMed ID: 19088943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles.
    Chan RC; Hsu TC
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impedance-based tissue discrimination for needle guidance.
    Kalvøy H; Frich L; Grimnes S; Martinsen OG; Hol PK; Stubhaug A
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Feb; 30(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19136732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Durability of monopolar Teflon-coated electromyographic needles.
    Mikolich LM; Waylonis GW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Oct; 58(10):448-51. PubMed ID: 907451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of a two needle electrode technique in percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy:An investigational laboratory study in an animal model.
    Derby R; Lee CH
    Pain Physician; 2006 Jul; 9(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 16886029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in motor unit action potential parameters in monopolar recordings related to filter settings of the EMG amplifier.
    Chu J; Chen RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 66(9):601-4. PubMed ID: 4038025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suction cup ground and reference electrodes in electrodiagnosis.
    Downey JM; Belandres PV; Di Benedetto M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Jan; 70(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 2916923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode polarization impedance in weak NaCl aqueous solutions.
    Mirtaheri P; Grimnes S; Martinsen OG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2093-9. PubMed ID: 16366232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.