These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 464895)

  • 21. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 2065838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Importance weighted audibility and the recognition of hearing aid-processed speech.
    Studebaker GA; Marincovich PJ
    Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 2707499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
    Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    McDaniel DM; Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 1608261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Listener-assessed intelligibility of hearing aid-processed speech.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 738919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of low-frequency hearing aid response on four measures of speech perception.
    Tecca JE; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 6706023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of hearing and use on speech discrimination and listening effort.
    Downs DW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 May; 47(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 7176597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aided listener preferences in laboratory versus real-world environments.
    Punch JL; Robb R; Shovels AH
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 8194679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality.
    Punch JL; Beck EL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Aug; 45(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 7412226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing speech recognition in noise for listeners with a signal processor hearing aid.
    Klein AJ
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 2721829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 2739387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of Multi-microphone Signal Enhancement Algorithms on the Acoustics and Detectability of Angular and Radial Source Movements.
    Lundbeck M; Hartog L; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Bramsløw L; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518779719. PubMed ID: 29900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 3745682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.