These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4652406)

  • 1. The effects of physiological noise on the auditory threshold.
    Moulin LK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Dec; 15(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 4652406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Speech audiometry with sentences and noise (author's transl)].
    Schultz-Coulon HJ
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1974 Oct; 53(10):734-49. PubMed ID: 4444388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Humming and nonorganic hearing loss.
    Gaynor EB
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Sep; 100(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 4852312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking level difference in normal and pathological ears.
    Quaranta A; Cervellera G
    Audiology; 1974; 13(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 4414577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Deafness in threshold audiometry].
    Weymar P
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1973 Jul; 67(14):718-22. PubMed ID: 4795209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking of spondees by interrupted noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Punch JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):245-52. PubMed ID: 681196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stapedectomy in advanced otosclerosis: a temporal bone report.
    Myers EN; Myers D
    J Laryngol Otol; 1968 Jun; 82(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 5659554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiometry with nasally presented masking noise: novel diagnostic method for patulous eustachian tube.
    Hori Y; Kawase T; Hasegawa J; Sato T; Yoshida N; Oshima T; Suetake M; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 16868507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Békesy's audiometry in the noisy environment of audio professional. auditory thresholds and the masking of noise in sound technicians with normal hearing].
    Tománek R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1974 Feb; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 4452101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Differential diagnosis of conductive deafness using impedance pressure and threshold changes].
    Opitz HJ; Schlöndorff G; Tegtmeier W
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Mar; 52(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 4698072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between middle-ear muscle reflex thresholds for bone- and air-conducted pure tones.
    Djupesland G; Flottorp G; Sundby A; Szalay M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973; 75(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 4692099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry.
    Jerger J
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Oct; 92(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 5455571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of acoustic reflex and loudness growth in normal and pathological ears.
    Beedle RK; Harford ER
    J Speech Hear Res; 1973 Jun; 16(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 4723984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory threshold impairment and everyday speech reception.
    Macrae JH; Brigden DN
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):272-90. PubMed ID: 4722026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masked speech audiometry in central deafness.
    Morales-Garcia C; Poole JP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Nov; 74(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 4639723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Differentiation between psychogenic hearing problems and malingering deafness (author's transl)].
    Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1974 May; 22(5):134-8. PubMed ID: 4842516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory filter nonlinearity across frequency using simultaneous notched-noise masking.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):454-62. PubMed ID: 16454300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of contralateral noise on the measurement of auditory threshold.
    Kawase T; Ogura M; Sato T; Kobayashi T; Suzuki Y
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2003 Jul; 200(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 14521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporary threshold shift reduction as a function of contralateral noise level.
    Karlovich RS; Luterman BF; Abbs MH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Dec; 15(4):792-9. PubMed ID: 4652401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory temporal integration at relatively high masked-threshold levels.
    Gengel RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1972 Jun; 51(6):1849-51. PubMed ID: 5045248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.