These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy. Smith GP South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical issues and perspectives in genetic technologies: an overview. Mahowald MB J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 11651005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prohibiting AIDS testing in the health insurance context: patching up a patchwork system. Russell SM Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1990; 5(1):131-53. PubMed ID: 11650434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The dilemmas of German bioethics. Brown E New Atlantis; 2004; 5():37-53. PubMed ID: 15586957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Yin and yang: the eugenic policies of the United States and China: is the analysis that black and white? Rodgers G Houst J Int Law; 1999; 22(1):129-68. PubMed ID: 12449957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Eugenics and the law's obligation to man. Weigel CL; Tinkler SE South Tex Law J; 1973; 14(3):361-91. PubMed ID: 11664216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of recombinant DNA technology on genetic screening. Gauthier CC Public Aff Q; 1989 Jan; 3(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 11651935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A shared history of shame: Sweden's four-decade policy of forced sterilization and the eugenics movement in the United States. Hyatt S Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1998; 8(2):475-503. PubMed ID: 16200697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Frontiers of genetic research: science and religion. Friend W Origins; 1995 Jan; 24(31):522-8. PubMed ID: 11659914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Which ills to bear?: reevaluating the "threat" of modern genetics. Capron AM Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):665-96. PubMed ID: 11653905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Futurity and permissibility of genetic engineering: the legal challenges. Westra J Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1974; 1(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 11662950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining the pros and cons of parental responsibility for genetic health. Twiss SB Hastings Cent Rep; 1974 Feb; 4(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 4529240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Presidential Decree No. 33 of 27 October 1994 promulgating the Law of the People's Republic of China on the protection of maternal and child health. China Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11660854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Aren't we all eugenicists? Commentary on Paul Lombardo's "Taking eugenics seriously". Mahowald MB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):219-35. PubMed ID: 15083829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetics and the common good. Tauer CA Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):14-35. PubMed ID: 16025643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond slogans: an abortion ethic for women and the unborn. Kelly JR Christ Century; 1990 Feb; 107(6):184-6. PubMed ID: 11655990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The medicolegal challenge of preparing for a brave, yet somewhat frightening new world. Smith GP J Leg Med (N Y); 1977 Apr; 5(4):9-13. PubMed ID: 301914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Alcohol, law and public policy: current controversies. Healey JM Conn Med; 1985 Jun; 49(6):407. PubMed ID: 4017589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]