These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4658481)

  • 1. Age differences in auditory reaction time of "brain-damaged" and normal children under regular and irregular preparatory interval conditions.
    Rourke BP; Czudner G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Dec; 14(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 4658481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age differences in visual reaction time of "brain-damaged" and normal children under regular and irregular preparatory interval conditions.
    Czudner G; Rourke BP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Jun; 13(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 5046080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaction time in brain-damaged and normal subjects to variable preparatory intervals.
    Olbrich R
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1972 Nov; 155(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 5082172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of distraction upon reaction time performance in brain-damaged and alcoholic patients.
    Callan JR; Holloway FA
    Neuropsychologia; 1972 Sep; 10(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 5080497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple reaction time in "brain-damaged" and normal children under regular and irregular preparatory interval conditions.
    Czudner G; Rourke BP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Dec; 31(3):767-73. PubMed ID: 5532098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal intensity and reinforcement effects on reaction time in brain-damaged and familial retardates.
    Hasazi JE; Allen RM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1227-33. PubMed ID: 4711974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-evaluating the effect of unilateral brain damage on simple reaction time to auditory stimulation.
    Bub D; Audet T; Lecours AR
    Cortex; 1990 Jun; 26(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 2387157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple reaction time: effects associated with age, preparatory interval, incentive-shift, and mode of presentation.
    Elliott R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1970 Feb; 9(1):86-107. PubMed ID: 5452110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrasting behavior of right and left hemisphere-damaged patients on a discriminative and a semantic task of auditory recognition.
    Faglioni P; Spinnler H; Vignolo LA
    Cortex; 1969 Dec; 5(4):366-89. PubMed ID: 5392959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latency of EEG attenuation ("blocking") in relation to age and reaction time in normal children.
    Surwillo WW
    Dev Psychobiol; 1972; 5(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 4655956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain damage and the ordering of two temporally successive stimuli.
    Swisher L; Hirsh IJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1972 Jul; 10(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 5055220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delayed sensory motor processing following cerebral damage. II. A multisensory defect.
    Belmont I; Handler A; Karp E
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1972 Nov; 155(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 5082170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in reaction time as a function of experience, stimulus intensity, and preparatory interval.
    Botwinick J; Storandt M
    J Genet Psychol; 1973 Dec; 123(2d Half):209-17. PubMed ID: 4795235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complex motor functions of the preferred and non-preferred hands in brain-damaged and normal children.
    Reitan RM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Oct; 33(2):671-5. PubMed ID: 5124121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective musical processing deficits in brain damaged populations.
    Shapiro BE; Grossman M; Gardner H
    Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 7254496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor time and reaction-time changes in children.
    Surwillo WW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):210. PubMed ID: 5054041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of the human brain stem auditory evoked response yielding new criteria for defining its abnormality.
    Thomas JG
    J Neurol Sci; 1984 Feb; 63(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 6707692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional differences between right- and left-cerebral hemispheres detected by the key-tapping method.
    Tsunoda T
    Brain Lang; 1975 Apr; 2(2):152-70. PubMed ID: 1182491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of interstimulus interval on continuous choice reaction time performance in brain-damaged, alcoholic and control patients.
    Parsons OA; Bruhn P
    Cortex; 1973 Jun; 9(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 4744362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor response time and task difficulty among aged and brain-damaged patients.
    Zaretsky HH; Brucker BS; Guttman AR; Mete J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1972 Sep; 53(9):418-24. PubMed ID: 5077817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.