380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4660703)
1. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance.
Gogel WC
Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 4660703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye movements and space perception.
Wist ER
Bibl Ophthalmol; 1972; 82():348-57. PubMed ID: 4568583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The anatomo-physiological bases of visual acuity].
Lavergne G; Dehon P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1978 Jan; 1(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 659800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Motion parallax and absolute distance.
Ferris SH
J Exp Psychol; 1972 Oct; 95(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 5071906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Binocular cues in the perception of distance of a point source of light.
Morrison JD; Whiteside TC
Perception; 1984; 13(5):555-66. PubMed ID: 6535981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Figural aftereffects as optical illusions?
Stadler M
Am J Psychol; 1972 Sep; 85(3):351-75. PubMed ID: 4655810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Size constancy and angular size matching in size perception of near objects.
Koh LH; Charman WN
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 10333187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The moon illusion revisited.
Iavecchia JH; Iavecchia HP; Roscoe SN
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Jan; 54(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6830556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scalar perceptions of distance in simple binocular configurations.
Mershon DH; Lembo VL
Am J Psychol; 1977 Mar; 90(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 871178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Familiar size affects the perceived size and distance of real objects even with binocular vision.
Maltz MV; Stubbs KM; Quinlan DJ; Rzepka AM; Martin JR; Culham JC
J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):21. PubMed ID: 34581767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size perception in the presence of individual cues for distance.
McDermott WP
J Gen Psychol; 1969 Oct; 81(2d Half):189-202. PubMed ID: 5353226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of overlay symbology in night vision goggles on accommodation and attention shift.
Schor CM; Task HL
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1039-47. PubMed ID: 8908341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual processing schema: a theory of perception.
Tayal OP
J Gen Psychol; 1971 Jul; 85(1st Half):3-28. PubMed ID: 5566734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scalar perception and judgment of angles.
Stacey BG; Maclean IE
Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Feb; 34(1):295-8. PubMed ID: 5011838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Depth affects where we look.
Wexler M; Ouarti N
Curr Biol; 2008 Dec; 18(23):1872-6. PubMed ID: 19062283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception.
Leibowitz HW; Harvey LO
Annu Rev Psychol; 1973; 24():207-40. PubMed ID: 4198918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Aerospace physiological optics. I. Depth perception.
Karlsberg RC; Karlsberg FS; Rubin M
Aerosp Med; 1971 Oct; 42(10):1080-5. PubMed ID: 5095505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate of apparent magnification as a cue to distance: laboratory investigation.
Ton WH
Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):283-8. PubMed ID: 5054052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A study on visual characteristics of binocular 3-D images.
Cho A; Iwasaki T; Noro K
Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1285-93. PubMed ID: 8888640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
