These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4661250)

  • 1. Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.
    Herrnstein RJ; Loveland DH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Nov; 18(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 4661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.
    Bushnell MC; Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):101-18. PubMed ID: 7365398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resurgence of responding after the cessation of response-independent reinforcement.
    Epstein R; Skinner BF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1980 Oct; 77(10):6251-3. PubMed ID: 6934550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.
    Jenkins HM; Moore BR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Sep; 20(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 4752087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons.
    Holt DD; Carlson JD; Follett VL; Jerdee NJ; Kelley DP; Muhich KM; Tiry AM; Reetz NK
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():37-43. PubMed ID: 23618788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior.
    HOLZ WC; AZRIN NH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jul; 6(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 13961497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of varied reinforcement on acquisition and extinction speed.
    Polín E; Pérez V
    Psicothema; 2017 Feb; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 28126064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditioned suppression of an avoidance response by a stimulus paired with food.
    Davis H; Kreuter C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 5018376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.
    Biederman GB; McDonald KG; Heighington GA; Vanayan M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 3361267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Key pecking operant conditioning in detelencephalated pigeons (Columba livia).
    De Souza CM; Britto LR; de Moraes Ferrari EA
    Behav Brain Res; 1990 May; 38(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 2363842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Avoidance response rates during a pre-food stimulus in monkeys.
    Henton WW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 4622951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delivering alternative reinforcement in a distinct context reduces its counter-therapeutic effects on relapse.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Sweeney MM; Shahan TA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 May; 109(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 29683191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.
    Cohen SL; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 1955817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.
    Allan RW; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 7964365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recency, repeatability, and reinforcer retrenchment: an experimental analysis of resurgence.
    Lieving GA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):217-33. PubMed ID: 14674730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.