These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4669918)
1. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Keith RW; Talis HP Audiology; 1972; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Modified Rhyme Test results from impaired- and normal-hearing listeners. Elkins EF J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 5163893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of interaural speech-recognition differences on binaural advantage for speech in noise. McCullough JA; Abbas PJ J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 1421457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency modulated tone thresholds in normal and abnormally adapting ears. Young IM; Harbert F Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Feb; 79(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 5415599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations. Aniansson G Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)]. von Wedel H Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study. Korsan-Bengtsen M Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1973; 310():1-75. PubMed ID: 4521066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaural attenuation characteristics in audiometry. Snyder JM Laryngoscope; 1973 Nov; 83(11):1847-55. PubMed ID: 4758145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 2359269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone conduction speech discrimination: an indication of cochlear function in the immediate postoperative period. Robinson M; Kasden SD Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Apr; 103(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 849203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Say-stay" identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners. Nelson PB; Nittrouer S; Norton SJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1830-8. PubMed ID: 7699164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech discrimination in noise. Cooper JC; Cutts BP J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 5558087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationships between speech recognition threshold, average hearing level, and speech importance noise detection threshold. Letowski T; Hergenreder P; Tang H J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1131-6. PubMed ID: 1447923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Lee and Lombard effects in determining the auditory selfcontrol of speech in children with hearing disorders]. Belov IM; Podgornykh AV; Shevchenko GF Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1975; (5):31-4. PubMed ID: 1231382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Some psychometric properties of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC). Christopherson LA; Humes LE J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 1405548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]