These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4670048)

  • 1. [Value of a rational phonetic progression in the learning of esophageal speech].
    Cornut G; Dominjon J; Varin F
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1972; 24(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 4670048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Phonetic evaluation of artificially produced voice].
    Takahashi H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1980 Jun; 83(6):725-8. PubMed ID: 7463197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Esophageal speech as a compensatory process].
    Sáfrán A; Szende T
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1973; 25(5):347-64. PubMed ID: 4752011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Radiologic study on the mechanism of the esophageal voice of laryngectomized patients. 2].
    Tachiiri H; Fujimi K; Mori S; Kotake T; Sato T
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1972 Aug; 51(8):539-49. PubMed ID: 5076580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative study of the intelligibility of the esophageal voice].
    Estienne F; Van den Eeckhaut J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1969; 23(5):564-84. PubMed ID: 5403072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Spectrum analysis of esophageal voice].
    Novák A
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1978 Oct; 27(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 709654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study of a intelligibility test for esophageal voice].
    Genet ; Gaches L; Vallancien B
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1970 Sep; 19(7):579-84. PubMed ID: 4250274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique for improving esophageal and tracheopharyngeal speech.
    Montgomery WW; Lavelle WG
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1974; 83(4):452-61. PubMed ID: 4850345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese.
    Werker JF; Pons F; Dietrich C; Kajikawa S; Fais L; Amano S
    Cognition; 2007 Apr; 103(1):147-62. PubMed ID: 16707119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks.
    Stager CL; Werker JF
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):381-2. PubMed ID: 9237755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental frequency characteristics of Japanese Asai speakers.
    Curry ET; Snidecor JC; Isshiki N
    Laryngoscope; 1973 Nov; 83(11):1759-63. PubMed ID: 4758133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of speech-type background noise on esophageal speech production.
    Clarke WM; Hoops HR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Jun; 79(3):653-65. PubMed ID: 5426891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of distributional learning on rats' sensitivity to phonetic information.
    Pons F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jan; 32(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16435970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical rehabilitation of voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Mozolewski E; Zietek E; Jach K
    Pol Med Sci Hist Bull (1973); 1973; 15(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 4784371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Formant frequency characteristics of esophageal speech.
    Sisty NL; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):439-48. PubMed ID: 5047882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Problems in speech development following larynx extirpation].
    Doubek F
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1967; 101(8):372-4. PubMed ID: 5593041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest reliability of independent measures of phonology in the assessment of toddlers' speech.
    Morris SR
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Jan; 40(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 18840673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.