These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4671456)
1. [Analysis with temporal indicator aids of learning mechanisms in tasks of concept identification]. Cauzinille E Annee Psychol; 1972; 72(2):443-62. PubMed ID: 4671456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of frequency of feedback on transfer in concept identification. Schroth ML Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 9100341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization. Little DR; Lewandowsky S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Role of instances in concept identification and acquiring of knowledge]. Vezin L Annee Psychol; 1972; 72(2):463-86. PubMed ID: 4671387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of labels and cues in children's concept identification. Scholnick EK Child Dev; 1971 Dec; 42(6):1849-58. PubMed ID: 5146020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Relating individual differences to the dimensions of human tasks. Fleishman EA Ergonomics; 1978 Dec; 21(12):1007-19. PubMed ID: 365521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrimination learning in retarded and nonretarded children as a function of task difficulty and social reinforcement. Harter S; Brown L; Zigler E Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 5148355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Concept abstraction in the aging dog: development of a protocol using successive discrimination and size concept tasks. Tapp PD; Siwak CT; Head E; Cotman CW; Murphey H; Muggenburg BA; Ikeda-Douglas C; Milgram NW Behav Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 153(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 15219721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a strategy--oriented training program on the verbal abstraction performance of EMRs. McIvor WB Am J Ment Defic; 1972 May; 76(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 5031086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The trouble with transfer: insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude. Opfer JE; Thompson CA Child Dev; 2008; 79(3):788-804. PubMed ID: 18489428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adult age differences in function concept learning. Griego JA; Kliegel M Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jan; 15(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 17851983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probabilistic categorization: how do normal participants and amnesic patients do it? Meeter M; Radics G; Myers CE; Gluck MA; Hopkins RO Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2008; 32(2):237-48. PubMed ID: 18226722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generality of perceptual biases in inference and concept usage. Scholnick EK Child Dev; 1971 Dec; 42(6):1937-49. PubMed ID: 5146023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Salmoni AW; Schmidt RA; Walter CB Psychol Bull; 1984 May; 95(3):355-86. PubMed ID: 6399752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]