These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 467535)

  • 41. Amplitude difference between pattern-evoked potentials after left and right hemifield stimulation in normal subjects.
    Kuroiwa Y; Celesia GG; Tohgi H
    Neurology; 1987 May; 37(5):795-9. PubMed ID: 3574679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Ristanović D; Hajduković R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):599-610. PubMed ID: 6165561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.
    Harding GF; Janday B; Armstrong RA
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 1764350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Clinical applications of visual evoked potentials for detection of chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions (author's transl)].
    Camacho LM; Wenzel W; Aschoff J
    Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970); 1981; 230(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 7295012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation II.
    Goodman D; Mulholland T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1988 Nov; 6(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 3225202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of the inter-stimulus interval on visual evoked potentials to patterned stimuli.
    Czigler I
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1979 Sep; 21(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 517072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. When do asymmetrical full-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials indicate visual pathway dysfunction in children?
    Mellow TB; Liasis A; Lyons R; Thompson D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 21046194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A comparison to pattern evoked responses.
    Cohen SN; Syndulko K; Tourtellotte WW; Potvin AR
    Arch Neurol; 1980 Feb; 37(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 7356412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spatio-temporal visually evoked scalp potentials in response to partial-field patterned stimulation.
    Darcey TM; Ary JP; Fender DH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Dec; 50(5-6):348-55. PubMed ID: 6160978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential.
    Holder GE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Aug; 45(2):278-80. PubMed ID: 78837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Electrophysiologic analysis of the process of recognizing target and non-target stimuli in healthy and oligophrenic children].
    Fishman MN; Trush VD
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1987; 37(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 3590965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interindividual variation and additivity of the visual evoked potentials to the local checkerboard stimulation of the central and paracentral retina.
    Airas KA
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Oct; 64(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 3811867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Scalp potential fields evoked by grating stimuli: effects of spatial frequency and orientation.
    Skrandies W
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Oct; 58(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 6207001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diurnal periodicity of lateral asymmetries of the visual evoked potential in healthy volunteers.
    Zimmermann P; Görtelmeyer R; Wiemann H
    Neuropsychobiology; 1983; 9(2-3):178-81. PubMed ID: 6684739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Characteristics and distribution of ERP by different field stimulation].
    Liu XQ; Li QQ; Chang P; Chen XP
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 28(1):28-31, 35. PubMed ID: 22435334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dissociation of frontal N100 from occipital P100 in pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Spitz MC; Emerson RG; Pedley TA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 2420568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.
    Harding G; Janday B; Armstrong R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 80(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 1505340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Hemispheric asymetry of the evoked electrical activity of the cerebral cortex to letter and non-verbal stimuli].
    Kostandov EA; Genkina OA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1976; 26(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1274440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field: sensory thresholds and neurophysiological correlates.
    Ludwig I; Skrandies W
    Biol Psychol; 2002 May; 59(3):187-206. PubMed ID: 12009561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Hemispheric differences in strong versus weak semantic priming: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Frishkoff GA
    Brain Lang; 2007 Jan; 100(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 16908058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.