126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4680759)
1. A new look at qualifying expert witnesses and the doctrine of privilege for forensic scientists.
Hilton O
J Forensic Sci; 1972 Oct; 17(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 4680759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Departure from handwriting system.
Miller JT
J Forensic Sci; 1972 Jan; 17(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 4680738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Shortcomings of reports of forensic medicine experts with regard to the professional malpractice of medical workers].
Panov IE; Faĭn MA; Isaev AI
Sud Med Ekspert; 1985; 28(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 3983994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Verbal conventions for handwriting opinions.
Evett IW
J Forensic Sci; 2000 Mar; 45(2):508-9. PubMed ID: 10782988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
Schofferman J
Pain Med; 2007; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relevance of the Goudge inquiry to the practice of child protection/forensic paediatrics.
Skellern C; Donald T
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Oct; 27():35-8. PubMed ID: 25287797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Standardization of the documentation utilized in conducting forensic medical expertise on material evidence].
Plaksin VO; Gurtovaia SV
Sud Med Ekspert; 1990; 33(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 2139983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Use of physicians as expert witnesses by the courts].
Befring AK
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 May; 124(10):1413-4. PubMed ID: 15195186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consideration of the writer's health in identifying signatures and detecting forgery.
Hilton O
J Forensic Sci; 1969 Apr; 14(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 5782009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical and moral dilemmas confronting forensic scientists.
Schroeder OC
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):966-86. PubMed ID: 11644169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The irresponsible expert witness: a failure of biomedical graduate education and professional accountability.
Brent RL
Pediatrics; 1982 Nov; 70(5):754-62. PubMed ID: 7133826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The forensic value of methods of toxicological investigations].
Schmidt G
Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1969; 25():122-7. PubMed ID: 5821365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An examination of the "CSI effect"--relevance for expert witnesses in the aerospace community.
Soper J
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1000. PubMed ID: 18856193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctrine, science, belief, evidence.
Kind SS
J Forensic Sci Soc; 1986; 26(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 3711855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The "nuts and bolts" of testifying as a forensic scientist.
Philipps KA
J Forensic Sci; 1977 Apr; 22(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 618163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A critique of the psychiatrist's role as expert witness.
Suarez JM
J Forensic Sci; 1967 Apr; 12(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 6034028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Requiem for the "general acceptance" standard in forensic science.
Moenssens AA
Leg Med; 1982; ():275-87. PubMed ID: 7121185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA fingerprinting: new technique on trial.
Anderson A
Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):408. PubMed ID: 2725664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison.
Sita J; Found B; Rogers DK
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 12353558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond?
Feld AD; Carey WD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 15842567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
