These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4680926)
1. Search time as a function of context letter frequency. Latimer CR Perception; 1972; 1(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 4680926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term retention of visually presented stimuli: some evidence of visual encoding. Nickerson RS Acta Psychol (Amst); 1976 Apr; 40(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 1258679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A cyclic decision model of perceptual alternation. Vickers D Perception; 1972; 1(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 4680924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of task, selection set, and dispersion of attention on visual identification time. Schioldborg P; Paus E; Myhre G Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 4759282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Transformation of stimulus information from very short-term memory. Klein HA Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):951-8. PubMed ID: 876807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of irrelevant colour changes on speed of name decisions. Kroll NE Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 May; 29(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 877220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Serial and parallel encoding processes in memory and visual search. Connor JM J Exp Psychol; 1972 Dec; 96(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 4645964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Processing capacity in a letter-matching task. Comstock EM J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 4744501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual pattern matching: an investigation of some effects of decision task, auditory codability, and spatial correspondence. Nickerson RS; Pew RW J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 4704212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Familiarity effects in visual information processing. Krueger LE Psychol Bull; 1975 Nov; 82(6):949-74. PubMed ID: 1103203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the attention cascade model to probe cognitive aging. Shih SI Psychol Aging; 2009 Sep; 24(3):550-62. PubMed ID: 19739911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of irrelevant color changes of speed of visual recognition following short retention intervals. Kroll NE; Kellicutt MH; Berrian RW; Kreisler AF J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jul; 103(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 4418703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search. Burnham BR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the speed of pop-out in feature search. Turatto M; Valsecchi M; Seiffert AE; Caramazza A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1145-52. PubMed ID: 20718563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial and nonspatial working memory and visual search. Takahashi J; Hatakeyama T Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):893-907. PubMed ID: 21879636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Brockmole JR; Wang RF; Irwin DE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):315-34. PubMed ID: 11999857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual load and attentional boost: a study of their interaction. Swallow KM; Jiang YV J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1034-45. PubMed ID: 24364707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]