262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 468176)
1. Research and experimentation in hospitals.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Oct; 53(19):58, 60, 64 passim. PubMed ID: 468176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of human subjects; proposed establishment of regulations.
Fed Regist; 1979 Apr; 44(80):24106-11. PubMed ID: 10241036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human experimentation: issues before the hospital administrator.
Wielk CA
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1977; 22(3):4-25. PubMed ID: 12085914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Duke's hazards. Did medical experiments put patients needlessly at risk?
Kaplan S; Brownlee S
US News World Rep; 1999 May; 126(20):66-8, 70. PubMed ID: 10387890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Finally, final rules on children who become research subjects.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 6629743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.
Rubinstein E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. FDA seeks tighter controls over research with human subjects.
Hershey N; Miller RD
Hosp Med Staff; 1978 Dec; 7(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 10239337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
Bryant LE
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research involving children: an interpretation of the new regulations.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1983; 5(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Innovative therapy. The responsibility of hospitals.
Cowan DH; Bertsch E
J Leg Med; 1984 Jun; 5(2):219-51. PubMed ID: 6611383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research with children.
Glantz LH
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):213-44. PubMed ID: 9702273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics quagmire and random clinical trials.
Tancredi LR
Inquiry; 1975 Sep; 12(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 126949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
Addicott DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Family dynamics and children in medical research.
Gordon VM; Bonkovsky FO
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):349-54; discussion 362-4. PubMed ID: 9029336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
