395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4684200)
1. Cervical biopsy versus conization.
Selim MA; So-Bosita JL; Blair OM; Little BA
Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 41(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 4684200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopic diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.
Stafl A; Mattingly RF
Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 41(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 4684199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis in preinvasive lesions of the cervix.
Karjalainen O; Järvilehto U; Nieminen U; Timonen S
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 4851356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix].
Ricaud Rothiot L; Hernández Arvízu JE; Villalobos Román M
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Dec; 52(332):285-303. PubMed ID: 6397410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A diagnostic and follow-up program for patients in the 20-34 year age group with suspicious cervical smears.
Bjersing L; Holmberg NG; Lundström P; Magnússon SS; Segerbrand E; Angström T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1971; 9():Suppl 9:78. PubMed ID: 5287134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frozen sections in cervical conization. A cytohistopathologic approach in the early diagnosis of carcinoma cervix.
Gupta RK
Obstet Gynecol; 1971 Aug; 38(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 4934629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "The mini-conor," evaluation as a biopsy technique in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Frable WJ; McDonald B; Smith J
Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):410-2. PubMed ID: 4517953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Estrogenic effect in vaginal smears in cases of carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Rubio CA
Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 4198740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of colposcopically directed biopsy and conization with histologic diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Savage EW
J Reprod Med; 1975 Dec; 15(6):211-3. PubMed ID: 1195261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer recognition of cell nuclei from the uterine cervix.
Bibbo M; Bartels PH; Bahr GF; Taylor J; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 4579185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Study with serial sectioning of 312 preclinical cancers of the uterine cervix. Indications for selective treatment (author's transl)].
Bremond A; Dargent D; Frappart L; Beau G
Bull Cancer; 1979; 66(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 526633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic and treatment problems and prospects in precancerous and early stages of cervical cancer].
Karag'ozov A
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1981; 20(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 7030097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Surface scraping and curettage of the cervix - an alternative procedure to conization in patients with positive cytology (author's transl)].
Egger H; Kindermann G; Michalzik K
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Dec; 35(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 1213255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].
Kasabova M
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 6385754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The occurrence of isolated dysplastic and carcinoma in situ type cells in cervical smears from patients with dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: significance to prescreening using image processing techniques.
Feldman M; Poulsen R; Shepherd L; Marshall KG
Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 4517951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Observations on the use of the colposcope for cervical neoplasia.
Ortiz R; Odell LD
J Reprod Med; 1970 Mar; 4(3):45-52. PubMed ID: 5520238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New concepts in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Roy M; Townsend DE; DiSaia PJ; Morrow CP
J Fam Pract; 1974; 1(3-4):10-3. PubMed ID: 4141723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Pre- and early stages of cervical carcinoma. Diagnosis and treatment].
Almendral AC; Szalmay G; Jochum L; Müller H
Fortschr Med; 1974 Sep; 92(26):1009-14. PubMed ID: 4410465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Exfoliative cytology in the uterine cervix. Possibilities, limitations and clinical consequences of a morphologic method].
Schuhmann RA
Pathologe; 1981 Dec; 3(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 7036131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
Berner A; Høeg K; Oppedal BR
Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
