These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4684810)

  • 1. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum as target material for mammographic x-ray tubes.
    Rini JM; Horowitz A; Balter S; Watson RC
    Radiology; 1973 Mar; 106(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 4684810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorbed dose in mammography using three tungsten and three molybdenum target tubes.
    Palmer RC; Egan RL; Tanner BK; Barnette PA
    Radiology; 1971 Dec; 101(3):697-9. PubMed ID: 5129114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of x-ray spectra and outputs from molybdenum and tungsten targets.
    Marshall M; Peaple LH; Ardran GM; Crooks HE
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Jan; 48(565):31-9. PubMed ID: 1109625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Setting of the soft X-ray field for the calibration of the dosimeters used in mammographic field].
    Sekimoto M; Katoh T; Satoh M; Yano K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 22805444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the filtration of mammographic X-ray tubes with molybdenum targets.
    Cranley K
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):842-5. PubMed ID: 1913049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.
    Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Investigations on contrast values in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schüle E; Seeger W
    Rofo; 1981 Aug; 135(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 6212315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental studies on the optimal mammographic technic].
    Gajewski H; Heilmann HP
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1971 Aug; 115(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 5107315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The determination of total filtration on mammographic X-ray sets.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):334-8. PubMed ID: 1581792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
    Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental "trans-molybdenum" tube for mammography.
    Johnson GA; O'Foghludha F
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 644079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the spectral response of the Wisconsin Mammographic kVp Cassettes.
    Cruty MR; Ghilardi-Netto T
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 7382918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M; Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography.
    Cardenosa G; Eklund GW
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):894-5. PubMed ID: 1535914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.